Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHARLITE
Rereading the article, Lembcke is the one lacking in credibility. Excerpts from their article, about the third paragraph, makes me wonder if Lembcke even is a Viet Nam Veteran, or even a Military Veteran.

Like many stories of the spat-upon veteran genre, Smith's lacks credulity. GIs landed at military airbases, not civilian airports, and protesters could not have gotten onto the bases and anywhere near deplaning troops. There may have been exceptions, of course, but in those cases how would protesters have known in advance that a plane was being diverted to a civilian site? And even then, returnees would have been immediately bused to nearby military installations and processed for reassignment or discharge.

Yes, we often did land at Military Bases. However, many of us were reassigned, as he said, but how did we travel to our new duty assignments? Civilian aircraft at civilian airports. Once we received orders, we were released to go through the main gate (often where protesters stood to hassle us) and sent on our way to travel where need be.

Since we weren't paid very much, we qualified for what was known then as Military Standby airfare. In order to gain it, we were required by the airlines to travel in full uniform and show orders.

Not only that, even if traveling in civies, if discharged, your luggage, an Army Duffle Bag, short hair and such immediately identified you as a Veteran or member of the Military. Most, after discharge, still flew in uniform to qualify for the cheaper rate of airfare.

All transfers between duty stations were by civilian transportation, airlines, bus or train, bus and airlines being the most commonly used.

Protesters would not have to know when a returning flight of of Veterans was diverted, on a daily basis, members of the military traveled through nearly every airport in the country. Back then, all airports had USOs in them as well. If we weren't using the civilian airports, why the USOs? We became simply Targets of Opportunity to them.

Is Lemcke truly a Veteran? I don't know, but he sure should be aware of what I say above, it's how we all traveled about.

68 posted on 05/02/2005 12:39:18 AM PDT by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DakotaRed
I don't know where this guy got his facts from. How can he say the military only landed at military installations going to to and from Vietnam. The only base I came into was Ft Lewis in 1970. All other trips to and from I went through Oakland and SF.

Did you know there were a lot of terrorists activity against armed forces recruiters at that time. Recruiting stations were bombed, offices and vehicles vandalized and recruiters murdered. No, they were not caused by unsatisfied customers.

Most of the murders of military recruiters was done by anti war types. Recruiters were targeted mainly because we were visible, in uniform all the time and we were easier to get at than military on bases. In the early seventies most recruiters I knew started carrying concealed weapons and we always kept one in the desk drawers.
84 posted on 05/02/2005 7:33:53 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson