Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
The president does not need congress to authorize any military action whatsoever.

He is the commander in Chief and nothing in the constiution or in law procribes differently. Period.

As far as letting such states enjoy the benefits of free trade to arm themselves to the teeth, well..


22 posted on 05/01/2005 1:01:40 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952
He is the commander in Chief and nothing in the constiution or in law procribes differently. Period.

That's a pretty twisted reading of the Constitution. The President has the responsibility to conduct wars that Congress authorizes and not otherwise per Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1 & 11:

Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Congress has the exclusive power to authorize war. The President runs the show once it is authorized. Period.
27 posted on 05/01/2005 1:32:09 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

see #22


121 posted on 05/02/2005 8:27:50 PM PDT by bitt ("There are troubling signs Bush doesn't care about winning a third term." (JH2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson