Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brazzaville
I agree that for all intents and purposes the Viet Cong ceased to exits after Tet and that the military
proficiency of the ARVN increased during the early years of the first Nixon presidency.
However, the ARVN never developed the skill necessary to cope with the North Vietnamese army without a US help. Perhaps the ARVN could have developed this skill over time,
but by 1970-71, a significant percentage of the people of the US, especially those people who wielded great influence over public opinion, were war weary and wanted out of the conflict, regardless of the consequences.
This unwillingness to support the ARVN had tragic consequences for the US troops who were required to serve in Vietnam and especially for the Vietnamese who had put their trust in the word of the US.
120 posted on 05/02/2005 5:33:45 AM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


Morning bump.


121 posted on 05/02/2005 6:13:10 AM PDT by aculeus (Ceci n'est pas une tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: quadrant
Good morning.

We will never know whether or not South Vietnam possessed the military skill to defeat the communists because those opinion-makers you wrote about made sure they were deprived of any support, of any kind, while Hanoi was armed and supplied by the entire communist world.

ARVN was crushed by mumbers, not skill.

Michael Frazier
124 posted on 05/02/2005 7:38:07 AM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson