Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mase
However, It seems misguided to me to avoid a policy that makes the whole nation richer because it makes some individuals poorer.

Even it were the case that "makes the whole nation richer because it makes some individuals poorer" still how do you measure "richer". For example is it better if the GDP capita is much higher at the expense of morality, religion, culture, local communities and plain happiness or freedom?

Are the riches the highest value? If not what values are higher? Can you list a few?

93 posted on 05/01/2005 9:35:04 PM PDT by A. Pole ("Truth at first is ridiculed, then it is violently opposed and then it is accepted as self evident.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: A. Pole

BTW, how is the "whole nation richer" when the balance sheet just keeps hemmoraging red ink? Consumer debt is something like near 90% of GDP. "Rich" isn't a Nintendo or Playstation in every home, it's lasting stuff like paid off homes and money in the bank (that doesn't depreciate like water evaporating either).


457 posted on 05/03/2005 9:00:27 PM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson