To: ninenot; 1rudeboy
As usual, rudie's using a sleight-of-hand set of stats. Seems the more rabid shills for the present "free trade" farce have the fewest rational answers to the most important questions. All they seem to offer is emotional fits, probably born out of the lust for profits.
Even the most devout political proponents of this shameful hoax do not even try to justify their extra-constitutional treachery by use of any historical fact because no facts pertain favorably. The absolute futility of allowing these greed-sick administrators to continue the destruction of America is becoming so evident that remarkable change can not be far away.
272 posted on
05/03/2005 8:57:48 AM PDT by
eskimo
To: eskimo
Even the most devout political proponents of this shameful hoax do not even try to justify their extra-constitutional treachery by use of any historical fact because no facts pertain favorably. Extra-constitutional treachery? I suppose you can provide examples?
277 posted on
05/03/2005 9:09:20 AM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with Karl Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
To: eskimo
Seems the more rabid shills for the present "free trade" farce have the fewest rational answers to the most important questions. All they seem to offer is emotional fits, probably born out of the lust for profits. On this particular thread, I posted my first sourced assertion in reply #19. And your contribution is?
To: eskimo
the lust for profits What is wrong with profits ? I like profits. I intend to make profits. The more profits the better. I try to invest in companies that make profits.
To: eskimo
One other thing. Do you realize the absurdity of claiming that I am having an "emotional fit" when you reply to someone else's comment that he disagrees with my statistics?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson