To: steveegg; txradioguy
It's South Korea's cage that's being rattled this time around. All that artillery aimed as Seoul isn't as frightening as 1 or 2 nuclear-tipped short-range missiles.
Right you are. Heck, even a couple of artillery shells with nuke warheads is likely within their ability.
Have we done anything to draw back troops or lower troop levels around the DMZ? I should have kept better track of what was going on there, but I don't want our boys in harms way with that maniacal helmet on the loose in NK.
Owl_Eagle
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
23 posted on
05/01/2005 6:19:54 AM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Owl_Eagle
Western Corridor is no more...everything is pulling back down south
25 posted on
05/01/2005 6:34:19 AM PDT by
txradioguy
(In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng Bn ...K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
To: Owl_Eagle
Right you are. Heck, even a couple of artillery shells with nuke warheads is likely within their ability. Have we done anything to draw back troops or lower troop levels around the DMZ? I should have kept better track of what was going on there, but I don't want our boys in harms way with that maniacal helmet on the loose in NK.
Point taken, though a nuclear artillery shell requires quite a bit more miniaturization than a missile topped with one (8" warhead for early nuclear artillery or 5" for later artillery, with the produced versions of the 5" nuke shells having sub-kiloton warheads, vs. 18" warhead for the FROG-7).
26 posted on
05/01/2005 6:39:58 AM PDT by
steveegg
(Bring back Hoosier, Firestone; SOMEBODY to get Badyear off their duffs and make a good tire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson