Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: N. Korea May Have Fired Missile
AP Via Yahoo ^ | 5/1/05

Posted on 05/01/2005 5:17:40 AM PDT by Raycpa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Owl_Eagle
Not to downplay other threats (Seoul, a bomb delivered to a U.S. port via ship), but this is the kind of stuff that makes me very cynical when I hear about NK's ability to fire a missle to our west coast.

It's South Korea's cage that's being rattled this time around. All that artillery aimed as Seoul isn't as frightening as 1 or 2 nuclear-tipped short-range missiles.

21 posted on 05/01/2005 6:16:03 AM PDT by steveegg (Bring back Hoosier, Firestone; SOMEBODY to get Badyear off their duffs and make a good tire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
The Japanese Cabinet in February approved legislation that would allow the defense chief to order the military to shoot down incoming missiles.

That's fortunate because otherwise I guess they would just have to watch the missile coming at them and do nothing about it.

Maybe I shouldn't be so shocked by the absurdity of that statement because our Democrats as recently as 9/10/2001 were arguing that it was intimidating to our enemies to try knocking their missiles out of the air...missiles that would be heading toward US cities.

22 posted on 05/01/2005 6:19:31 AM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg; txradioguy

It's South Korea's cage that's being rattled this time around. All that artillery aimed as Seoul isn't as frightening as 1 or 2 nuclear-tipped short-range missiles.

Right you are.  Heck, even a couple of artillery shells with nuke warheads is likely within their ability.
 
Have we done anything to draw back troops or lower troop levels around the DMZ?  I should have kept better track of what was going on there, but I don't want our boys in harms way with that maniacal helmet on the loose in NK.
 
Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

23 posted on 05/01/2005 6:19:54 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
GO AHEAD....MAKE MY DAY!!!!! PUNK!
24 posted on 05/01/2005 6:22:04 AM PDT by maineman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

Western Corridor is no more...everything is pulling back down south


25 posted on 05/01/2005 6:34:19 AM PDT by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng Bn ...K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Right you are. Heck, even a couple of artillery shells with nuke warheads is likely within their ability.

Have we done anything to draw back troops or lower troop levels around the DMZ? I should have kept better track of what was going on there, but I don't want our boys in harms way with that maniacal helmet on the loose in NK.

Point taken, though a nuclear artillery shell requires quite a bit more miniaturization than a missile topped with one (8" warhead for early nuclear artillery or 5" for later artillery, with the produced versions of the 5" nuke shells having sub-kiloton warheads, vs. 18" warhead for the FROG-7).

26 posted on 05/01/2005 6:39:58 AM PDT by steveegg (Bring back Hoosier, Firestone; SOMEBODY to get Badyear off their duffs and make a good tire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All
I want a 12-pack of OB Beer and a 1/2lb of Bulgogi and Rice or I'm gonna get pissed!
27 posted on 05/01/2005 6:42:15 AM PDT by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng Bn ...K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Think this was a FUBAR. 65 mile range missile would have been fired incountry so they could recover reentry vehicle, etc.

Notice no "Happy Workers at Missile Plant # 93 Are Overjoyed ...." type announcements.

Bet this was supposed to go much farther, and flubbed.
28 posted on 05/01/2005 6:43:38 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Probably a little Saber rattling at Japan for two reasons....a) they are talking about making their own nuclear arsenal as protection from the DPRK...and b) they are going to be part of the missile shield.

I also read the other day that the Jappanese are working on re-doing the parts of their constitution that makes it almost impossible to deply the JDF beyond their own borders.


29 posted on 05/01/2005 6:47:37 AM PDT by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng Bn ...K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
"I want a 12-pack of OB Beer and a 1/2lb of Bulgogi and Rice or I'm gonna get pissed!"

Bulgogi, outstanding food. Was it in Korea that I had "33" beer? (Maybe forty years ago now.)

30 posted on 05/01/2005 7:50:36 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
The Japanese Cabinet in February approved legislation that would allow the defense chief to order the military to shoot down incoming missiles.

The North Koreans, taking the Iranian's advice, would explode a warhead high over the center of the Japanese island, to maximize its EMP effects, hundreds of miles in the air from Patriot-missile type defense systems.

31 posted on 05/01/2005 8:03:53 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Given the above, the North Koreans do not need pinpoint targeting ability for an EMP strike over Japan.


32 posted on 05/01/2005 8:07:39 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: blam

You would have had 'bulgogi' in ROK for sure, but the "33", or "ba me ba", would have been 'the Nam'. About the only thing drinkable in Korea fourty years ago would have been "OB" and "Crown", not to mention the old rot gut favorites like "soju" and "dondonju".


34 posted on 05/01/2005 8:19:30 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
so they could recover reentry vehicle, etc.

There is no need for a reentry vehicle for an EMP mission. It's exploded above the atmosphere of the target country.

35 posted on 05/01/2005 8:26:12 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
"You would have had 'bulgogi' in ROK for sure, but the "33", or "ba me ba", would have been 'the Nam'."

I made a lot of Asian ports in those days, they start to 'run-together.'

36 posted on 05/01/2005 8:34:21 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ketteringOH
we must invade and accupy and return them to democracy.

With what? We probably have less than 50,000 troops we can use for this given our commitments in the middle east.

37 posted on 05/01/2005 8:45:27 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy; TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; All

OH TG be careful well I going ping North Korean news list


38 posted on 05/01/2005 9:35:15 AM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

What we ought to do is be prepared for the next North Korean saber-rattling missile test and shoot it down in flight to send NK a message.


39 posted on 05/01/2005 9:50:14 AM PDT by Diognetes (ESL Teachers for Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

The same as March 2003. An anti-ship cruise missile test.


40 posted on 05/01/2005 10:54:49 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson