Skip to comments.
A North Korean Nuclear Egg Laid (Hillary blames Bush now that it has hatched)
GoGov ^
| April 30, 2004
| Russell Betts
Posted on 04/30/2005 1:16:10 PM PDT by BJungNan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: Search4Truth
The liberals certainly know how to target the intelligence of their constituency..............
The "intelligence" of their constituency is the root of ALL our problems.
To: BJungNan
22
posted on
04/30/2005 2:19:14 PM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Brilliant
Lets hope some louder voices in Congress from the Republicans side, and the NEW MEDIA can out shout her in the blame, and point the blame back at her and her husband.
Lets hope this will be one of the big issues that will come up if she runs for President, and she will be defeated.
23
posted on
04/30/2005 2:20:18 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Mad Mammoth
Newsmax already reported the findings about North Korea and her rant is not only false but also it was the Clinton Administration that gave them their current capability. (Paraphrase)
Based on a 1999 congressional finding that North Korea first obtained the capacity to develop nuclear weapons under your husband's administration, which actually gave Kim Jong Il nuclear technology in exchange for the promise that he would not make weapons.
(I think Bush was still the Governor of Texas at that time.)
In addition the same House North Korea Advisory Group warned: "If the [Clinton administration's] 1994 Agreed Framework is implemented and two [U.S. Light Water Reactors] are eventually built and operated in North Korea, the reactors could produce close to 500 kilograms of plutonium in spent reactor fuel each year; enough for nearly 100 bombs annually if North Korea decides to break its obligations and reprocess the material."
The advisory group also blasted the Clinton administration for making North Korea "the largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid in the Asia-Pacific region."
"In an astonishing reversal of nine previous U.S. administrations," the report said, "the Clinton-Gore administration, in 1994, committed not only to provide foreign aid for North Korea, but to earmark that aid primarily for the construction of nuclear reactors worth up to $6 billion."
The advisory group also warned that North Korea would soon be able to hit the U.S. with ICBMs - and blamed the Clinton administration for facilitating Pyongyang's progress.
Now the next time Hillary wags her finger at the current administration, make sure your closet doesn't have any skeletons in it.
Amen.
24
posted on
04/30/2005 2:20:33 PM PDT
by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
To: Brilliant
Hey, you can't blame this on Bill Clinton!! He sold US military secrets to the Chinese, not the North Koreans!!
25
posted on
04/30/2005 2:20:58 PM PDT
by
Tacis
( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
To: BJungNan
Is hillary adding insult to injury, or politics to treason? This is the biggest example of RATS blaming 'pubs for RAT crimes that I've ever seen.
To: aShepard
Let's not forget.
India and Pakistan didn't have nukes when Bill Clinton was elected.
But they both had them when he left!
27
posted on
04/30/2005 2:23:46 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: stm
You mean, conveniently forgotten by the Clintons, MSN , and the Sheeple.
But, we have not forgotten about it.
28
posted on
04/30/2005 2:24:14 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Grateful One
"The "intelligence" of their constituency is the root of ALL our problems."
But its not just the double digit intellects - simple minded folks have been great patriots - no, it's more than that; it's a character defect of sorts, compounded by environment. The tragic part is that I believe it is entirely curable if caught early.
29
posted on
04/30/2005 2:24:45 PM PDT
by
Search4Truth
(When a man lies he murders some part of the world.)
To: silverleaf
Hillary considered her pathetic self a Co-President. So, she can rejoice in her "accomplishments."
Soft and cowardly on terrorism.
The pardons of convicted terrorists.
The aid to China which enabled the Chinese to make their rockets more reliable.
The aid to North Korea which enabled the North Koreans to build nuclear weapons.
Regarding North Korea though, since that nation is still an enemy of the United States, why haven't top officials of the Clinton Administration been jailed for treason?
30
posted on
04/30/2005 2:25:37 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Abortion and "euthanasia" - the twin destroyers of the Democrat Party.)
To: Enterprise
Yup.... that about sums it up , the way the scum liberals are.
I could not have put it more eloquently myself in your analyzes of the Liberals.
31
posted on
04/30/2005 2:29:43 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Brilliant
You'd think Hillary would have enough sense not to highlight the deficiencies in her own husband's record. Unfortunately, Bush himself did not have any sense during his first debate with Kerry, repeatedly giving the disasterous Clinton-Carter-Albright nuclear welfare plan a complete pass. Kerry and Lehrer kept giving Jorge a chance to bash the Clintons for "losing N Korea", and he punted every time.
When Hillary runs, expect the same kind of cowardice from our side.
To: BJungNan
33
posted on
04/30/2005 2:55:40 PM PDT
by
Unicorn
To: airborne
India exploded a "peaceful nuclear device" at a sub-surface test facility in the Great Thar Desert (IIRC) in 1974. They took advantage of the fact that the US was distracted by Watergate, Cyprus, etc.
34
posted on
04/30/2005 2:56:37 PM PDT
by
skepsel
To: montag813
I don't think so. Bush gave him a pass because he's not the kind to attack a fellow politician, particularly someone he's not running against. Of course, Hillary will claim she had nothing to do with it, but if she's going to blame Bush (who won't be there to respond), then you can bet her opponent will point out that her husband allowed all this, and she helped.
To: Tacis
He gave the N. Koreans a light nuclear reactor.
To: BJungNan
To: Brilliant
You'd think Hillary would have enough sense not to highlight the deficiencies in her own husband's record. Maybe she knew she would get a pass from the LameStream Media on this (and all) issue.
To: Tacis
Stupid ass where do you think the north Koreans get their information
To: silverleaf
Thanks for the link. Very interesting.
40
posted on
04/30/2005 4:46:56 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
(Check out http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson