I'm not understanding you. The poster Friday night was criticizing many others here for wondering if there was something odd about the story --- that an abductor would abduct someone, cut their hair, take them across the country, then LET THEM GO because of too much media attention. It seemed too far-fetched to some. We felt that the story had a particular smell to it. It turned out that it did.
Speculation is not all bad is my point. I don't think we should disagree on that.
The poster was telling everyone (in some colorful language) to wait for the facts to come out. We pointed out that if FR and others had waited for all the facts to come out on Rathergate, there may have been a different president.
Anyhow, healthy speculation is a benefit often, imo.
Huh? What different president do you see if we had "waited" for a different set of facts on Rathergate?......I'd really like to know......
Does that give you an excuse to delve into someone's personal page? Because every poster ought to know you will respond about what someone has on there personal page. And you will respond privately. Aint' that convenient?
But that has nothing to do with the story.......or does it?