Posted on 04/30/2005 12:05:31 AM PDT by kcvl
Edited on 04/30/2005 12:28:18 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
It's a joke. Understand?
Short on a sense of humor, I see.
God, how I love the judgmental ones.
Ah, NO. I see you as what I took you for. Someone who comes onto to thread to stomp somebody for a stand they they took. You're pretty transparent.
Thanks for helping Hildy. She really needed it.
What two? How about continuing to ignore.......or you may make me think that you and "beyond the sea" are "linked" in some way, eh?
Sorry, But what if I called ALL of the speculation out of line. OR WE DON'T CARE. WHAT in the world would you do then?
You can ask us to step out, but we all really, really are still here!!
No we are not.
and never mind then.
It is late
can we please all play nice?
Thanks,
Sidebar Moderator
I stand by my reply #2511. Read it again. Have a nice day. Or not.
"3,206 posted on 05/01/2005 1:41:58 AM CDT by A Citizen Reporter
"No we are not.
and never mind then. "3,209 posted on 05/01/2005 1:50:18 AM CDT by oceanperch [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3206 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]"
Oh Good, Glad to hear it.
I'm not understanding you. The poster Friday night was criticizing many others here for wondering if there was something odd about the story --- that an abductor would abduct someone, cut their hair, take them across the country, then LET THEM GO because of too much media attention. It seemed too far-fetched to some. We felt that the story had a particular smell to it. It turned out that it did.
Speculation is not all bad is my point. I don't think we should disagree on that.
The poster was telling everyone (in some colorful language) to wait for the facts to come out. We pointed out that if FR and others had waited for all the facts to come out on Rathergate, there may have been a different president.
Anyhow, healthy speculation is a benefit often, imo.
Huh? What different president do you see if we had "waited" for a different set of facts on Rathergate?......I'd really like to know......
Pat Paulsen
Cute, but Tommy Smothers was Kilted dead in the 60's by CBS's Nielson's ratings.....
I still hopes she gets a full panal thyroid scree done and a physical when she get home.
I pray she grows a spine and tells her family what is eating at her and that they respect and support her personal views.
She needs to get something off her chest and move on in life.
Pat was later approached by the Smothers Brothers with the idea of running for President. Pat's reply was "Why not? I can't dance - besides, the job has a good pension plan and I'll get a lot of money whan I retire."
Pat's campaign was based in comedy and he ran it using outright lies, double talk and unfounded attacks on his challengers. Who would have thought this style would be the method of campaigns in the future? His work on the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour earned Pat an Emmy in 1968.
****
He was a very nice guy. He came to Carnegie Mellon (Tech) in 1972 and brought the house down.
Does that give you an excuse to delve into someone's personal page? Because every poster ought to know you will respond about what someone has on there personal page. And you will respond privately. Aint' that convenient?
But that has nothing to do with the story.......or does it?
Who knew he was still alive?
Better yet, WHO CARED?
Talk about someone from the 60's who thought he was WAY more important than he ever was.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.