Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldier denied as conscientious-objector
AP ^ | 4/29/5 | RUSS BYNUM

Posted on 04/29/2005 10:10:11 AM PDT by SmithL

SAVANNAH, Ga. - The Army said Friday it has denied conscientious objector status for a soldier who refused to deploy to Iraq for a second tour, saying he became morally opposed to war during the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

Sgt. Kevin Benderman, 40, filed his objector application Dec. 28, just 10 days before he skipped his unit's deployment flight. The Army mechanic faces a court-martial May 12 on charges of desertion and missing movement.

The conscientious-objector denial came Wednesday from the Army's Headquarters Department, Fort Stewart spokesman Lt. Col. Robert Whetstone said.

Benderman and his military attorney, Maj. Scott Sikes, did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment Friday.

Benderman, who has served 10 years in the Army, has said his eight months in Iraq in 2003 included scenes of misery such as a badly burned young girl and mass graves filled with men, women and children.

He had faced tough questions about his sincerity at a February hearing on his application, especially regarding his decision to file his claim days before the Fort Stewart-based 3rd Infantry Division began deploying 19,000 troops to Iraq in January.

His commanders contend Benderman was obligated to deploy with his unit, the 3rd Forward Support Battalion, while the Army processed his objector claim.

The military defines a conscientious objector as someone who opposes war in all forms for deeply held moral or religious reasons.

If convicted at his court-martial, Benderman faces up to seven years in prison, reduction in rank to private and a dishonorable discharge.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benderman; deserter; fortstewart; ftstewart; kevinbenderman
Another ploy that doesn't work.
1 posted on 04/29/2005 10:10:11 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Throw him in prison. Rid him of his pension and give him a dishonorable discharge when he is finished his prison sentence. He is a disgrace.
2 posted on 04/29/2005 10:12:09 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Benderman, who has served 10 years in the Army, has said his eight months in Iraq in 2003 included scenes of misery such as a badly burned young girl and mass graves filled with men, women and children.

You can't conscientiously object to seeing disturbing things.

This is the weakest justification for insubordination yet.

3 posted on 04/29/2005 10:14:40 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If he was a conscientous-objector, he never should have signed up in the first place. This guy shouldn't go to the front-lines, he's a security risk who would probably betray his unit or do something else to get people killed because he is disgruntled. The Army should keep him in the rear and give him the worst jobs possible. Let him dig ditches and latrines and have him be the #1 guy to get called whenever a truck needs unloaded or floors need swept.


4 posted on 04/29/2005 10:15:39 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Proud infidel since 1970.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Throw him in prison.
Rid him of his pension
give him a dishonorable discharge when he is finished his prison sentence.

That sounds fair.

5 posted on 04/29/2005 10:16:57 AM PDT by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
He had faced tough questions about his sincerity at a February hearing on his application, especially regarding his decision to file his claim days before the Fort Stewart-based 3rd Infantry Division began deploying 19,000 troops to Iraq in January.

That's my little brother's division.

So my brother is over there fighting for America, and this joker isn't because he likes the paychecks but he doesn't like the scenery.

Give him 10 years in Leavenworth and see if he likes the scenery there.

6 posted on 04/29/2005 10:17:07 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
funny that he found his morals after his first tour...

maybe he should try to pull a 'klinger' like on m.a.s.h.?

7 posted on 04/29/2005 10:18:04 AM PDT by NoClones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Something of a disconnect to enlist in the Army and then try to make a claim that you're a CO.


8 posted on 04/29/2005 10:18:23 AM PDT by dfrussell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
If he was a conscientous-objector, he never should have signed up in the first place...

Now if he were a pharmacist who didn't want to fill birth control 'scripts, on the other hand...

9 posted on 04/29/2005 10:22:03 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfrussell

My cousin did it the right way - during the Vietnam war, he applied for and received CO status. Then went next door to the Army Recruiter, gave them the paperwork and enlisted with the promise he'd be a medic. They trained him as a medic and sent him to Vietnam. Served two tours over there, and never fired a shot in anger. Earned several medals for courage under fire - and the whole time as a CO.


10 posted on 04/29/2005 10:31:36 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (The Crew Chief's Toolbox: A roll around cabinet full of specialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
He missed movement in time of war? Yeah, he needs to grasp at some straws.

There is an old saying, I hope I get it right: "When you take the King's shilling, you march to the King's drums."

If I didn't get that right does anyone remember how it goes.

Basically what it means now a days is that if you are going to accept the bennies eventually you are going to earn em.
11 posted on 04/29/2005 10:42:13 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Don't lock him up. Fine him the max amount, reduce him to E-1, and dishonorably discharge him. Then watch him try to get a decent jobe.

Besides, he presumably served honorably for his first 10 years and his 8-month Iraq tour. That is still worth something, even if he lost his nerve later.


12 posted on 04/29/2005 10:43:35 AM PDT by No Longer Free State (Standing in the way of progress is not a party platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State; SmithL

Thanks for posting this SmithL and I will say I agree with everything my beloved said in comment 12.


13 posted on 04/29/2005 11:16:50 AM PDT by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

As a chaplain, I handle CO applicants on occasion. I've yet to recomend someone be discharged as a CO.


14 posted on 04/29/2005 12:13:42 PM PDT by bethelgrad (for God, country, the Marine Corps, and now the Navy Chaplain Corps OOH RAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
If he was a conscientous-objector, he never should have signed up in the first place. This guy shouldn't go to the front-lines, he's a security risk who would probably betray his unit or do something else to get people killed because he is disgruntled. The Army should keep him in the rear and give him the worst jobs possible. Let him dig ditches and latrines and have him be the #1 guy to get called whenever a truck needs unloaded or floors need swept.

......nope... wrong, put him in Baghdad on convoy to and from the airport to work on trucks that breakdown.... get him up to the front and hopefully rid the gene pool of his cowardice. Now we can only hope for the full 7 years in Leavenworth making big rocks into little rocks.

15 posted on 04/29/2005 12:49:04 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
... Earned several medals for courage under fire - and the whole time as a CO.

An excellent example of the intent of CO status.

16 posted on 04/29/2005 1:05:13 PM PDT by dfrussell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

Sounds good. Have him work on the trucks on convoy duty and don't give him a gun because he is a security risk.


17 posted on 04/29/2005 2:27:16 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Proud infidel since 1970.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson