To: ninonitti
The Parkers can homeschool their kid. They don't have to subject him to the multicultural liberal indoctrination that passes for public education. Withdrawing their child from Lexington's skrool would prove a point. He's not the state's property to brainwash as it pleases.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
3 posted on
04/29/2005 1:22:01 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
"Withdrawing their child from Lexington's skrool would prove a point."
I like having my kids homeschooled.. The best part besides blossoming young minds, who haven't had their natural human curiosity of the world crushed....
Is the local and state school districts get paid per child that enrolls. My kids would mean many thousands of dollars for the teacher's union, and the sociological overlords in the system.
6 posted on
04/29/2005 1:57:07 AM PDT by
ran15
To: goldstategop
The Parkers can homeschool their kid. They don't have to subject him to the multicultural liberal indoctrination that passes for public education. Withdrawing their child from Lexington's skrool would prove a point. He's not the state's property to brainwash as it pleases.What you say is true and should happen. However the fight should not be given up since there are many kids in that school who are still being indoctrinated. Schools need to be accountable and if people like the Parkers don't step up to the plate the schools will have free reign on taxpayer dollars to teach what they want and how they want. Not to say that much of that is already going on.
To: goldstategop
No, he needs to continue to fight. To withdraw his child from that school would be to concede to the homosexuals. If we keep running away, then continue to win.
12 posted on
04/29/2005 3:06:12 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: goldstategop
Homeschooling is not an option for everyone. Simply saying they have the option is about as usuless as trying to find a cell phone company that does not have lopesided agreements.
The principle has an EXPLICIT legal requirement to allow mothers and fathers to opt out their children from sexual material. ALL homosexuality is a sexual material.
To: goldstategop
The father was asked why he didn't sent his son to private school. He pointed out that he is paying Lexington property taxes (undoubtedly sky high) and he shouldn't have to.
41 posted on
04/29/2005 7:38:55 AM PDT by
maryz
To: goldstategop
However, they should not have to withdraw him from school.
The word liberal is a misnomer.
Liberals don't want diversity of opinion they only want it their way.
What the hell is happening in our schools.
Teachers are committing rape against little boys, teaching perverted marriage and safe ways to have sex.
The skools of today are like the Opium Dens of the 1800,s.
Only more dangerous.
49 posted on
04/29/2005 8:01:07 AM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(LL THE)
To: goldstategop
The Parkers can homeschool their kid. They don't have to subject him to the multicultural liberal indoctrination that passes for public education. They will still be required by law to pay for the indoctrination of other kids.
70 posted on
04/29/2005 2:13:47 PM PDT by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson