Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesnuffy
In fact the Army should be given the Air Force's A-10s

Wholeheartedly agree. Gotta believe the Army understand the requirements, necessities and importance of blowing up enemy tanks and artillery much better than the USAF.

67 posted on 04/28/2005 6:40:19 PM PDT by Hat-Trick (Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Hat-Trick
And how are they going to stage in the field a jet that weights 30,000lbs, carries 17,000lbs of munitions, requires all those bullets and gas. . .and operate out of a field somewhere? Nah. . .nice to dream about but the Army can't sustain it and the Army doesn't want to--they just want to control it.
114 posted on 04/29/2005 12:41:43 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Hat-Trick

Didn't the Commandant of the Marine Corps recently offer to take over the A-10 program if the Air Force abandonded it?


121 posted on 04/29/2005 1:16:29 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Hat-Trick
Gotta believe the Army understand the requirements, necessities and importance of blowing up enemy tanks and artillery much better than the USAF.

But they don't understand flying. I spent 2 years as an ALO, and there is no idea WORSE than letting the Army control airpower. They understand the need (as does the USAF guy with them on the ground!), but they don't have clue one about how to deliver it.

Well, maybe Hillary as Pres is a worse idea, but...

153 posted on 05/01/2005 4:37:53 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson