yeah, you're right.
I'm of the uninformed opinion that nothing will come of that project just because its too big.
there's something esthetically wrong about looking for a way to cut costs with something big and costly.
but my arguement is merely to do with esthetics.
maybe too I like the idea of power streaming in from many cheap portable sources rather than one really big cheap source.
The Manhattan Project employed some 10,000 scientists at its peak and cost $24 billion in 2005 dollars..