Published: April 27, 2005
Posted on 04/27/2005 11:00:55 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/27/international/asia/27china.html
By JOSEPH KAHN
Published: April 27, 2005
EIJING, April 26 - A top Chinese state-run newspaper said in a staff editorial this week that the wave of popular protests against Japan were part of an "evil plot" with "ulterior motives," suggesting that at least some elements of the Chinese leadership now wish to portray the demonstrations as a conspiracy to undermine the Communist Party.
The editorial, published in The Liberation Daily of Shanghai on Monday, used the most strident language to date in an escalating campaign against the anti-Japan protests, which officials had previously done relatively little to stop - and some say had even encouraged - for three weeks to mid-April.
The authorities have now made clear that they will not tolerate more protests and have detained some people involved in vandalism during earlier demonstrations, including 42 people Shanghai officials said they took into custody in recent days.
Officials are clearly concerned that the protests, if left unchecked, could evolve into a direct challenge to the party.
The newspaper, whose editorials reflect the orders of Shanghai's Communist Party leadership, did not identify the people behind the supposed plot or say how it operated. But the ambiguous wording hinted at one of two possibilities: that the protests were hijacked by antigovernment groups, or that elements in the ruling party used them to wage an internal political struggle.
"The preponderance of facts prove that the recent illegal marches were not a patriotic movement, but rather amounted to illegal behavior," the editorial said. "They were not a spontaneous movement of the masses, but rather had a backstage plot."
"The facts have already shown that the marches that occurred in some localities were an attempt to achieve hidden goals," it said. "Communist Party members must clearly see through to the essence of this struggle and understand its gravity."
The wording in the editorial, which did not immediately appear in other major state-run dailies, was striking because it departed markedly from earlier official descriptions of the protests as spontaneous expressions of popular outrage against Japan. The softer language had been widely viewed as signaling tacit approval.
For example, on April 12, even after the string of sometimes violent protests, China's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Qin Gang, repeated an official mantra.
"Some people, acting because of the incorrect attitude Japan has taken toward its history of aggression, spontaneously held protest demonstrations," Mr. Qin said. "The Chinese government asks that people participating in these marches take a cool and reasoned approach and express their views in a legal and orderly way."
A senior editor at a party-run newspaper in Beijing said the Shanghai editorial had been intended to frighten people away from taking part in any future anti-Japan demonstrations.
But a political analyst in Beijing offered a different explanation. He said the government had been sending conflicting signals about the protests because Japan policy has become a source of internal contention.
"I think you cannot rule out the possibility that the tension is not between the authorities and the people, but between some rival elements inside the party," this person said.
The analyst said there were similarities between the Monday editorial and one that appeared in People's Daily in late April 1989. It condemned student-led pro-democracy protests that spring as "counter-revolutionary," and gave early evidence of a power struggle that paralyzed the government for weeks before the military crushed the protests.
Power struggle or dissident infiltration of protests? How about both? They found out some antigovernment element did infiltrate the protests or is about to do so. This exacerbated already contentious discord among top leadership regarding the handling of protests. Now it has turned into a full-fledged power struggle.
That's what they get for inciting trouble in the first place.
Ping!
Yeah, a classic blow-back.
I was about to ping you to tell you about this article because you pointed this out a few weeks ago to me. then I realized it was TigerLikesRooster :-]
You gotta love CommieUNism (Sarc)/ With CommUNism, if it doesn't fit the plan, you can blame anyone and the "Sheepsters" will follow. Baahhaaaaaaa
You remembered.:-) Actually I owe it to another Freeper tallhappy. It is getting interesting.
The Chinese gov't is transparent.
Andy Japanese office would know that these events are simply ways of scaring Japan into doing things. North Korea does the exact same thing.
"Oh we're gonna get you!"
"We really are!"
"Ok, forget the whole thing, we forgive you. Give us money."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.