Today's teens, says Savin-Williams, generally don't require a sexual definition in order to express who they are.
Say what?
And teens are getting many of these diversity messages from media models . . .
"Media models". It could certainly be that he means role models like actors or news anchors, but I think he means characters in fictional stories, "media" or reached out in a projection type format.
This would be social engineering, and, since every tiny part of a story is contrived, deliberate social engineering. Remember when actors and actresses playing pregnant or birthing characters in the soaps would get a flood of gifts?
"Sometimes when I interview my college students, even they are amazed at what's going on with the younger kids," Savin-Williams says.
This 'way too fast for a society normally evolving toward beneficial and stable governing principles.
. . . it can be increasingly difficult and unrewarding to divide into "us-and-them" exclusions.. . .
There will always be an "us and them" when it involves disgusting behaviors made so by the antithesis of same to basic paradigms of physical reality.
Also, the definition of "gay" is increasingly harder to pin down. . . .most of us are somewhere in between [gay and heterosexual]," he notes.
Right. 3% homosexual and 97% heterosexual.
For many people of all ages, love is situational, based on the person rather than gender.
Certainly. Most folks have a close friend that they love, but he's not talking about love; he's talking about greasing each other.