No, they pose other safety and waste concerns. (Neutron embrittlement of the reactor vessel is one obvious problem.)
(Neutron embrittlement of the reactor vessel is one obvious problem.)
Obviously!!
Anneal the damage out or swap out the vessel. I had a design on the books for a nuclear plant with replaceable components (including the pressure vessel). Nobody was interested because they thought it was too much of a (financial) risk.
" (Neutron embrittlement of the reactor vessel is one obvious problem.)"
That's the first thing I thought of too. :)
Also I believe at least one of the hydrogen isotopes (deuterium?) most feasible for a thermonuclear reaction right now would produce some radioactive by-products. The half life, though, would be much shorter than uranium/plutonium waste.
I really hope to see an operational fusion reactor in my lifetime-- I think the ITER project has a good chance of bringing us there, and I hate to see that govt research funding in this area has been cut over the last decade.