Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uncle Sam wants you... to explain this $50 cash deposit
arstechnica.com ^ | 4/27/2005 | Hannibal

Posted on 04/27/2005 7:59:32 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty

In 2006, it'll be a whole lot harder to cheat on your taxes, even accidentally. In fact, you'll also have to field calls from the government over odd deposits that you make, e.g. a deposit at an odd time of the month, or a cash deposit, or a deposit made from a foreign bank, etc. That's because, thanks to the PATRIOT act, banks are spending billions on highly sophisticated, government-mandated anti-money laundering (AML) software that will track every last transaction of every last customer in order to build up individual customer profiles and look for "suspicious" activity. And when they find some suspicious activity, they're going to want an explanation out of you, regardless of whether or not you fit any sort of terrorist profile.

(Excerpt) Read more at arstechnica.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; biggovernment; constitution; invasive; irs; libertarians; paranoia; patriotact; patriotactworks; privacy; taxes; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-206 next last
Comment #121 Removed by Moderator

To: MineralMan
If you can divide the date by two and not have a remainder, then that date is even. If not, it's odd. I do so hope that helps.
 
Heh, heh.......'splains it to me. LOL

122 posted on 04/27/2005 9:13:25 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; all4one

Yeah, the ACLU ran these ads last fall, showing "ordinary American" types all worried that the PATRIOT Act would allow the feds to come into "my house," and they said the Act would be renewed "without debate, without review." For some reason, the Left is desperate to make Americans believe we're under some sort of fascist regime (I love the photos of the lefty rent-a-mobs carrying the "we don't have free speech anymore" signs) and the PATRIOT Act is their favorite ruse. They'll tell you all the nasty things the feds can do...but not mention that they could already do it and that they can only do it with a proper warrant. They'll even pretend (as they did in the aforementioned ad) that there's no Congressional oversight, that in september of '01 Congress just said, "What, you want to be the Fuehrer? Okey-dokey!"

And Freepers take the bait, without even considering what the real world implications are.

123 posted on 04/27/2005 9:14:49 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("Slippery slope? Try cliffdiving."--Freeper Crazieman comments on the post-Terri world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777
Your were lucky the local Police Department did not know about it when you were on your way to the bank. Such amount of cash surely had some traces of drug and your money would be lawfully forfeited!
124 posted on 04/27/2005 9:15:05 AM PDT by A. Pole (The Law of Comparative Advantage: "Americans should not have children and should not go to college")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
BAD

Good

125 posted on 04/27/2005 9:15:10 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: macaroona
The Patriot Act does nothing to stop terrorism. I think it was designed so the government can monitor ordinary Americans and increase its own power.

So...the act's provisions have not been used to capture any terrorists living in the U.S.?

126 posted on 04/27/2005 9:16:26 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("Slippery slope? Try cliffdiving."--Freeper Crazieman comments on the post-Terri world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: verity
"Hyperbole."


FWIW ... I agree. Much ta do bout nothin. ;)

127 posted on 04/27/2005 9:17:20 AM PDT by G.Mason ( Because Free Republic obviously needed another opinionated big mouth ... NRA member since 1964)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
The NRST advocates haven't mentioned how they are going to get the states to actually repeal the 16th. Any NRST with repealing the 16th is simply stupid stupid stupid stupid as we will have 30% income tax and 20% nrst before long, british-style.

Actually, after hearing a spokesperson from Fair Tax on Vickie McKenna's show in Madison, I was under the impression that a NRST Amendment would begin with "The 16th Amendment is hereby repealed" or some similar language. Therefore, if the states weren't willing to repeal the income tax, the NRST wouldn't happen.

128 posted on 04/27/2005 9:19:43 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("Slippery slope? Try cliffdiving."--Freeper Crazieman comments on the post-Terri world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #129 Removed by Moderator

To: A. Pole

"I am sure you reported the yard sale of your used hair dryer and old dot matrix printer. (Filing the special tax schedule of course)
"

I don't do yard sales. If I have usable items I no longer need, I donate them to Goodwill. And I don't itemize deductions, so I don't even bother with receipts from Goodwill.

A simple life helps keep life simple.


130 posted on 04/27/2005 9:22:08 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Review later


131 posted on 04/27/2005 9:22:41 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us
If the Feds can only convict 5% of the known criminals, what do you think the chances of you and I even getting scrutinized? This is cryin' wolf!

Well, this isn't really enough info. What was the composition of this 5% result? How many false arrests were mixed in with the valid arrests/convictions? It really doesn't say.
132 posted on 04/27/2005 9:26:16 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
Well, this isn't really enough info. What was the composition of this 5% result? How many false arrests were mixed in with the valid arrests/convictions? It really doesn't say.
 
The author is from the Wall Street Journal. You have to pay real money to read their rag online, but if you want to research more on it, that's where it came from. I, myself refuse to pay anyone to read information.

133 posted on 04/27/2005 9:30:31 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

No surprise. You can hammer away at so-called "conspiracy buffs" all you want. It's only a "conspiracy" if it's a secret. The monied and liberal elites have been saying for years where they're headed:

"The Technocratic Age is slowly designing an every day more controlled society. The society will be dominated by an elite of persons free from traditional values (!) who will have no doubt in fulfilling their objectives by means of purged techniques with which they will influence the behavior of people and will control and watch the society in all details". "... it will become possible to exert a practically permanent watch on each citizen of the world".

- Zbigniew Brzezinski - (Co-founder, Trilateral Commission)


134 posted on 04/27/2005 9:30:52 AM PDT by gregwest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

"And here I thought the PATRIOT Act was only to be used to pursue terrorists"

You were misinformed. So were we all.


135 posted on 04/27/2005 9:37:41 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

The year 1913 was an unmitigated disaster for all true Americans. The income tax never should have seen the light of day.

The fact that taxes would be higher in the Republic than under the British King would be anathema to our Founding Fathers.

Take a look at the Colonial tax rates (vis a vis what we have now) and you will see what I am talking about.


136 posted on 04/27/2005 9:50:02 AM PDT by Bald Eagle777 (Liberalism is bad news for modern man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us
The author is from the Wall Street Journal. You have to pay real money to read their rag online, but if you want to research more on it, that's where it came from. I, myself refuse to pay anyone to read information.

Yeah, I hear you.

Meanwhile, this source indicates that in 2001, 13 million currency transaction reports were filed, and 1.5 million were at some point identified in the course of a criminal investigation. That sounds like a lot of hits that turned out to be nothing. Maybe the right thing happened in every case, and nobody got needlessly harassed. Still, I'll keep checking...
137 posted on 04/27/2005 9:50:06 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese
No chance that this is real.

I'd be more inclined to credit it if they would be kind enough to quote the particular provision of the Patriot Act that would apply.

138 posted on 04/27/2005 9:53:51 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

That would have ruined my day.


139 posted on 04/27/2005 9:54:02 AM PDT by Bald Eagle777 (Liberalism is bad news for modern man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: gregwest; ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; ...
"The Technocratic Age is slowly designing an every day more controlled society. The society will be dominated by an elite of persons free from traditional values (!) who will have no doubt in fulfilling their objectives by means of purged techniques with which they will influence the behavior of people and will control and watch the society in all details". "... it will become possible to exert a practically permanent watch on each citizen of the world".

- Zbigniew Brzezinski - (Co-founder, Trilateral Commission)

Wasn't it in Orwell's 1984? BTW, it is fishy how quickly Orwell died after writting his last book (from sudden onset of rare type of tuberculosis)?

140 posted on 04/27/2005 9:56:52 AM PDT by A. Pole (The Law of Comparative Advantage: "Americans should not have children and should not go to college")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson