Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/27/2005 7:14:07 AM PDT by ParsifalCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TexasGreg; GarySpFc

Important article.


2 posted on 04/27/2005 7:25:18 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ParsifalCA

BTTT


3 posted on 04/27/2005 7:45:49 AM PDT by aculeus (Ceci n'est pas une tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ParsifalCA

Related thread:


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1390055/posts


4 posted on 04/27/2005 7:47:04 AM PDT by aculeus (Ceci n'est pas une tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ParsifalCA

America's next cultural export to sweep the world: McIslam!


5 posted on 04/27/2005 8:01:21 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ParsifalCA

Duh. Of course, the government had to make reassuring noises to Islam, whatever it really believed. To go after Muslims in general would be hugely stupid and counter-productive.


6 posted on 04/27/2005 8:03:38 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ParsifalCA
I can't see how this could possibly work. Changing the religious outlook of millions of muslims would take generations if it was possible at all. Islam was born out of force, and is maintained by use of force. Any passive means to try and change it will be futile.

Let's not forget that there are people who have been trying to change Christianity for thousands of years, and it's still a strong and viable institution. What's more likely is that the dollars used to counter radical Islam will be used against the West, and the institutions built with those dollars will be converted to anti-American pro-Islamic sites.

To promote Islam contravenes the First Amendment ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion") and one constitutional expert, Herman Schwartz, deems the sponsorship of Islamic institutions to be "probably unconstitutional."

This phrase is what will draw anti-religious organizations into the fray, especially the anti-American ACLU. Although this section of the Constitution refers to the US no doubt ACLU lawyers will ask (and probably get) the High Court to broaden its reach to include the Middle East as well. Religion is religion and fighting religion is what the ACLU, among other anti-religious groups, does - even if it's part of a war effort. That the myopia of these groups may lead to suicide for them, and death for others, seems to be irrelevant.

American dollars would be better spent containing the disease we call "radical Islam" to the Middle East, and finding a way to abandon reliance on the Saudi's oil. What's needed is an "ideological fence" around the Middle East that will contain radical Islamics, and permit only a small amount of muslims to pass through that "fence" on a guarded and limited basis.

7 posted on 04/27/2005 8:07:33 AM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ParsifalCA
The David Kaplan article is at http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/050425/25roots.htm

A must-read piece.

8 posted on 04/27/2005 8:58:22 AM PDT by Nicholas Conradin (If you are not disquieted by "One nation under God," try "One nation under Allah.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: USF; Fred Nerks; ariamne; appalachian_dweller; Former Dodger; swordfish71; Bennett46; CHARLITE

ROP ping!


9 posted on 04/28/2005 8:42:22 AM PDT by jan in Colorado ("For such a time as this...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson