Don't know about you, but I wouldn't mind doing away with the filibuster for legislation. Little known fact - up until the Senate rules changes of 1806 the majority could vote to end debate. Filibusters really are about minority rule anyway.
I don't have problems with filibusters, provided they're used as originally intended -- to allow additional time for debate. But they shouldn't be abused as tool to indefinitely prevent votes.
I don't have a problem with a filibuster, provided it's used as originally intended -- to provide additional time for debate before voting. I do have a problem with filibusters being used to indefinitely prevent the holding of a vote (whether it be for legislation or for judges).