"too many times the family enjoys the ill-gotten gains but receives no punishment."
Just because someone may have benefited indirectly from a crime does not mean they should be held into account for the crime ( if in fact they had nothing to do with the crime ).
This is basically the same argument being used for slavery reparations.
I think I would be less concerned if there was a DIRECT showing that the 3k was directly used to buy the tickets.
Of course she could have offered the tickets herself and that part is not covered by the story.