Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Up Or Down Vote (Democrats' Double Standard)
Republican National Committee ^ | April 25, 2005

Posted on 04/25/2005 1:21:58 PM PDT by RWR8189

Clockwise: Priscilla R. Owen, William G. Myers III, Terrence W. Boyle, Richard Allen Griffin, William H. Pryor, Jr., Brett M. Kavanaugh and Janice Rogers Brown. Click on the photos above to see the resumes of these qualified judges.

Democrats' Double Standard

hyp·o·crite -- n. One who pretends to be what he is not or to have principles or beliefs that he does not have

The Democrats' efforts to block President Bush's qualified judicial nominees are not only hypocritical but are examples of partisan politicking at its worst.

Republicans in the Senate are working to ensure that all of President Bush's judicial nominees receive a fair and final up-or-down vote. Despite Senate history and tradition, Democrats are aggressively trying to prevent qualified judges from receiving what's been afforded every judicial nominee for over 200 years.

During the Clinton Administration, Democrats demanded up-or-down majority votes on judicial nominations, but, now that they are in the minority, they have become the party of obstructionism and double standards.

The Constitution guarantees an up or down vote, but the Democrats don't want to perform their duty.

On July 25, 2003, President Bush made history by nominating Janice Rogers Brown to the federal bench. Brown is the first African American elected to the California Supreme Court and was reelected by California voters with 76% of the vote.

The daughter of Alabama sharecroppers who grew up in segregated schools in the midst of Jim Crow policies in the South, Brown is a single mother who worked her way through college and law school.

Despite her sterling personal and legal credentials, during the 108th Congress, Senate Democrats used a hypocritical double standard to block her nomination. Judge Brown is not alone. Senate Democrats obstructed an up-or-down vote on 9 other well-qualified judges. Some of these judges have been waiting for a vote for four years.

It seems Democrats have changed their tune on giving all judicial nominees a fair up-or-down vote. They now claim the filibuster is a sacred tool of the Senate. But in 1995, Democrats, including nine who still serve, voted to rid the Senate of this tool.

That's right, nine current Democratic Senators voted to get rid of the filibuster. Now that it suits their needs, they praise it. What's worse than this hypocrisy is these same Senators now lead the obstruction and threaten to shut down the Senate. Their claims of loyalty to, and reverence for, Senate traditions are just another sham designed to hide their hypocrisy.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; bush43; democrats; doublestandard; filibuster; gop; harryreid; judical; judicialnominees; judiciary; nominees; obstructionism; reid; rnc; upordown; ussenate

1 posted on 04/25/2005 1:22:17 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Yeah - it's priceless to see a bigot like Robert Byrd telling a black woman she's not qualified for the federal bench.

If I were a journalist, here's the first question I'd ask Byrd:

"So Senator, in your time as a Klansman, exactly how many black familites did you intimidate, endanger or even terrorize? How many crosses did you and your associates burn?"


2 posted on 04/25/2005 1:26:47 PM PDT by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Democrats? hypocrites?

Woah! That's a shocker!

3 posted on 04/25/2005 1:40:19 PM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The Constitution guarantees an up or down vote, but the Democrats don't want to perform their duty.

The Democrats pay no attention to the Constitution unless it suits their purpose.


4 posted on 04/25/2005 1:52:23 PM PDT by Cat loving Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Dear Mr. Mehlman:
 
Another example of a hypocrite:  Both President Bush and Governor Bush took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the U.S. Constitution.
 
In that Constitution, the 14th Amendment says that no state shall deprive any person of life without due process of law.
 
"Due process" refers to conviction of a crime.  "Due process" does not refer, ever, to processes designed to deprive innocent people of their lives.  Such "processes" are merely conspiracies to commit murder under color of law.
 
Thus, when the state of Florida, of which Governor Bush is the chief executive, deprived Terri Schiavo of life, i.e., murdered her, and Governor Bush and President Bush both refused to use their executive powers to save her life, both men violated their oath of office, because both men took the position that the government of the state of Florida DOES have the authority to murder people.
 
And yet, if you were to ask both of these men whether they believe that the 14th Amendment is the law of the land, both of them would lie, and tell you that they do.
 
But we all know that the they don't, because both of them repudiated the 14th Amendment when they conceded to the state of Florida the authority to murder Terri Schiavo.
 
So, there's another great example of hypocrisy that you could write about in your next e-mail.
 
Sincerely,
 
Arthur McGowan
 
----- Original Message -----

Team Leader
April 25, 2005  

Dear Arthur,

Hypocrite - noun, one who pretends to be what he is not or to have principles or beliefs that he does not have.

The Democrats' blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada blah blah blah yada yada yada are not only hypocritical but are examples of partisan politicking at its worst.

Sincerely,

Ken Mehlman
Chairman, RNC

To Forward This Email To Your Friends And Family, Please Click Here

Unsubscribe
Copyright © 2005 Republican National Committee. Privacy Policy.

Paid for by the Republican National Committee. Not Authorized By Any Candidate Or Candidate Committee. www.gop.com

5 posted on 04/25/2005 2:25:14 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan
The Democrats pay no attention to the Constitution unless it suits their purpose.

Agree 100%, but may I add something?

The Democrats and their minions, the activist, liberal judges pay no attention to the Constitution unless it suits their purpose.

Thank you.

6 posted on 04/25/2005 2:59:59 PM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Make the DIMS actually Filibuster the vote.


7 posted on 04/25/2005 6:44:08 PM PDT by HP8753 (My cat is an NTSB Standard,The Naval Observatory calls me for time corrections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Thus, when the state of Florida, of which Governor Bush is the chief executive, deprived Terri Schiavo of life, i.e., murdered her, and Governor Bush and President Bush both refused to use their executive powers to save her life, both men violated their oath of office, because both men took the position that the government of the state of Florida DOES have the authority to murder people.

Bears repeating---and I'll do my part to see that it gets it. Thank you, Arthur McGowan.

8 posted on 04/25/2005 8:51:35 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson