Posted on 04/25/2005 1:21:58 PM PDT by RWR8189
|
Clockwise: Priscilla R. Owen, William G. Myers III, Terrence W. Boyle, Richard Allen Griffin, William H. Pryor, Jr., Brett M. Kavanaugh and Janice Rogers Brown. Click on the photos above to see the resumes of these qualified judges. |
|
hyp·o·crite -- n. One who pretends to be what he is not or to have principles or beliefs that he does not have
The Democrats' efforts to block President Bush's qualified judicial nominees are not only hypocritical but are examples of partisan politicking at its worst.
Republicans in the Senate are working to ensure that all of President Bush's judicial nominees receive a fair and final up-or-down vote. Despite Senate history and tradition, Democrats are aggressively trying to prevent qualified judges from receiving what's been afforded every judicial nominee for over 200 years.
During the Clinton Administration, Democrats demanded up-or-down majority votes on judicial nominations, but, now that they are in the minority, they have become the party of obstructionism and double standards.
The Constitution guarantees an up or down vote, but the Democrats don't want to perform their duty.
On July 25, 2003, President Bush made history by nominating Janice Rogers Brown to the federal bench. Brown is the first African American elected to the California Supreme Court and was reelected by California voters with 76% of the vote.
The daughter of Alabama sharecroppers who grew up in segregated schools in the midst of Jim Crow policies in the South, Brown is a single mother who worked her way through college and law school.
Despite her sterling personal and legal credentials, during the 108th Congress, Senate Democrats used a hypocritical double standard to block her nomination. Judge Brown is not alone. Senate Democrats obstructed an up-or-down vote on 9 other well-qualified judges. Some of these judges have been waiting for a vote for four years.
It seems Democrats have changed their tune on giving all judicial nominees a fair up-or-down vote. They now claim the filibuster is a sacred tool of the Senate. But in 1995, Democrats, including nine who still serve, voted to rid the Senate of this tool.
That's right, nine current Democratic Senators voted to get rid of the filibuster. Now that it suits their needs, they praise it. What's worse than this hypocrisy is these same Senators now lead the obstruction and threaten to shut down the Senate. Their claims of loyalty to, and reverence for, Senate traditions are just another sham designed to hide their hypocrisy.
Yeah - it's priceless to see a bigot like Robert Byrd telling a black woman she's not qualified for the federal bench.
If I were a journalist, here's the first question I'd ask Byrd:
"So Senator, in your time as a Klansman, exactly how many black familites did you intimidate, endanger or even terrorize? How many crosses did you and your associates burn?"
Woah! That's a shocker!
The Constitution guarantees an up or down vote, but the Democrats don't want to perform their duty.
The Democrats pay no attention to the Constitution unless it suits their purpose.
April 25, 2005
To Forward This Email To Your Friends And Family, Please Click Here Unsubscribe
Copyright © 2005 Republican National Committee. Privacy Policy.
Paid for by the Republican National Committee. Not Authorized By Any Candidate Or Candidate Committee. www.gop.com
Agree 100%, but may I add something?
The Democrats and their minions, the activist, liberal judges pay no attention to the Constitution unless it suits their purpose.
Thank you.
Make the DIMS actually Filibuster the vote.
Bears repeating---and I'll do my part to see that it gets it. Thank you, Arthur McGowan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.