Now that they're relying on "international" law instead of constitutional law, can we really expect them to do what they're supposed to do?
And congress and the Prez are far from blameless in enacting some of this bilge.
If we've treatied into international law into that situatin, how then would the court rule. The Constituion, or would a treaty enacted after the writing of the Consitituion supercede?
But you did bring up law enacted by our elected representatives and signed by the President in our representative democracy. Yet when it's something you disagree with, it's bilge that needs overturned. You want judicial activism when it serves our purpose?