Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kms61

Can someone tell me how do defend the bankruptcy bill against liberal attacks, Im having trouble.


23 posted on 04/25/2005 12:22:30 PM PDT by Liberal_Lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Liberal_Lies

Sure, its called paying your bills.

First off, they are wrong when they say 90% of bankruptcies are due to medical bills. They are not unless you count drug addiction, alcoholism, and gambling addiction as "medical".

Second thought: just tell them to go tear up their credit cards if they don't like the rules of the road. Nobody is forcing them to use credit cards.


49 posted on 04/25/2005 12:36:14 PM PDT by smag999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Liberal_Lies

Sure, its called paying your bills.

First off, they are wrong when they say 90% of bankruptcies are due to medical bills. They are not unless you count drug addiction, alcoholism, and gambling addiction as "medical".

Second thought: just tell them to go tear up their credit cards if they don't like the rules of the road. Nobody is forcing them to use credit cards.


50 posted on 04/25/2005 12:36:16 PM PDT by smag999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Liberal_Lies
Can someone tell me how do defend the bankruptcy bill against liberal attacks, Im having trouble.

The bankruptcy bill is supposed to close a solvency loophole used by 'players', i.e. people that obtain unsecured debt that they never had any intention of repaying. The change in the method by which solvency is determined will, in theory, raise the bar for Chapter 7 (debt forgiveness) high enough that people that have sufficient income vs. their debts to repay at least a portion of it will be restricted to filing Chapter 13 (debt consolidation) instead. People filing because of overwhelming losses, unanticipated catastrophic events, and other circumstances that render them completely wiped out should still be able to qualify for Chapter 7.

The major effect this would have on consumers is that lower losses to creditors will translate into a lower burden the people paying for their loans have to carry. In other words, people who have the means to at least partially shoulder the repayment of their loans will no longer have the option of shunting the full load onto other consumers, while those totally buried under insurmountable debt (usually medical bills) can still find relief.

74 posted on 04/25/2005 12:55:02 PM PDT by Antonello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Liberal_Lies
You wouldn't be part of this circus, would you?
95 posted on 04/25/2005 1:50:49 PM PDT by Chong (America is Too Great for Small Dreams. Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson