You can diss o'reilly, but when you diss Hannity you're scumbag. I think savage is the scum of the earth. Hannity IQ = 140 Savage = 70.
Can't you like both?
I enjoy both Hannity and Savage....
Savage's humor is very sharp...And very cruel and times..
But he's got his opinion and doesn't mince words...
Savage has a following in both parties and those without a party.. He's been the leader in the media on the border and illegal immigration issue and I think he could bring a divide among conservatives on this issue alone.. That's scary for the Republicans in power.
I remember Hannity's concern at first about the Minutemen and how he was concerned about vigilantes--- Funny, same words from Bush.. He's since come around because he feels it's safe to be on the issue now...
I am a Bush supporter but my allegiance ends with his border and immigration stance. If the Republicans aren't pro active and listen to the Savages and the Hedgecocks of the world, then the Republicans will be divided in elections to come..
I know this because I am one of them and there's a heck of us out here fed up with the just talking about the border and immigration..
Thank you Michael Savage for placing that as a foundation ( Border, language and culture) that most are just getting to touch on it in the other media marketplaces.
After 9-11, I think it's issue #1 and it's been poo pooed by both sides....
I'll have to disagree.
Hannity is not smarter than Savage.
I never get bored listening to Savage. Hannity at times is like a tape recorder spewing out the same show day after day. I agree with the message, but it's not intellectually stimulating ( I don't mean that as a sleight).
You may not agree with Michael's viewpoint, but he's much more intelligent than Hannity. I like Hannity, but it's obvious he's basically a repeater of party line information.
He's not the brightest out there. this is especially obvious to me when he interviews cracked up libs like
Jenenane Barfalot on his show.
Savage is a very intelligent, very independent, and very different animal all together. His popularity is derived
from his penchant to say whatever he is thinking, and to say it with great passion. He intially comes off as a
small minded bigot, but I believe he uses this technique
to get attention. and it works.
He doesn't stay on message like Hannity. I tend to agree with less of what he says, but I totally agree with his
insights on several major conservative issues such as abortion, immigration, the Democratic/Communist party etc..
Say what you want about Savage and his flamethrower techniques, but he is the holder of several advanced degrees, writer of many books on biology of plants, and
much better spoken than Sean. Sean has incredible discipline, he does his homework and is more diplomatic.
Just not as interesting.
My humble opinion.
Snot.
Is this why they call Mike Savage "Dr."? I have never heard anyone call Sean "Dr.". I must admit that I do love Hannity's show, and totally respect him for all that he accomplished in the 04 election, and really like him more than Dr. Savage. But Dr. Savage does have his moments of insight, and the largest cajones of all talkshow hosts.
typo?
shouldn't that be Savage .07? :O)
If Hannity's IQ was anywhere in excess of ~100, his show would be a little more original and his interviewing skills would be MUCH better.
Love Savage. Hannity and O'Reilly are peas of a pod. Glenn Beck in the morning and Rush in the afternoon. Hannity and O'Reilly are poseurs. The on/off button works for all if need be.