I'm constantly amazed how those who could avail themselves of good arguments in support of their position choose instead to advance frivolous ones.
The denial of FOOD and WATER to a disabled person, is most CERTAINLY a *FELONY*!
Not to mention, that the very GAL that Greer assigned to Terri in 1998, when MS first requested that Terri be starved and dehydrated to death, specifically stated in no uncertain terms to JUDGE GREER, that it was his opinion, that MS, given the substantial CONFLICT OF INTEREST as terri's Guardian, was not able to PROVE *clear & convincing evidence* and thus, it was his recommendation and opinion, that terri's feeding tube NOT be removed!
WHY? Because it was ALSO his opinion, given all of the FACT, that MS stood to PROFIT financially almost immediately, upon the death of his *wife* terri Schiavo.