Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
Not if this line is any indication:

"... the ban was porous - so porous that assault weapons remained widely available throughout their prohibition."
3 posted on 04/24/2005 2:30:32 PM PDT by Terpfen (New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Terpfen

Of course they have the use the excuse that the ban wasn't good enough, to try to pass even stricter bans, such as outlawing ALL guns.

What else would you expect from gungrabbers?

Here is a relevant article:

Police turn to judges over rising knife use

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/News/2005/04/22/1007789-sun.html

The number of weapons offences involving knives in the city has spiked, prompting city police to prepare reports for Crown attorneys on the skyrocketing statistics. Police hope the reports, which will be provided when someone convicted of a weapon offence is sentenced, will show judges that the use of knives is a dangerous trend in London.

In 2003, London police investigated 165 offences involving knives, compared to 190 in 2004 and 63 in the first three months of this year -- a 50 per cent increase compared to the same time period in 2004.

====

As we keep saying, it's not the guns, it's the people.


7 posted on 04/24/2005 2:36:08 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson