Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
However, it is generally agreed amongst evos that if two disparate sexual groups are able to interbreed as a matter of course, and their offspring can also breed, then the two groups are of the same species.

No, that's a very confused statement.

Of course individuals that routinely breed are of the same species, but there are populations that are genetically capable of producing fertile offspring that seldom or never interbreed. You are asking questions that imply the word species somehow determines reality. Species is just a word with fuzzy edges. Darwin called species a strong variety. He also used the term race interchangeably with species. They're just words.

96 posted on 04/26/2005 11:43:52 AM PDT by js1138 (e unum pluribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Actually, it is very clear. Reread it. It appears to me that either you don't understand what the statement "as a matter of course" means or you missed it in your reading of my post.

That said, I reiterate that I'm not trying to start a flamefest here. I'm just pointing out that amongst evos, speciation is often a matter of opinion that has nothing to do with the ability to crossbreed. The article implied that different species of humanoids interbred routinely. According to your own statement, this means that these humanoids were not of different species.
97 posted on 04/27/2005 8:53:43 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson