Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OKIEDOC
You can only drive people so far until they retaliate.

If you look at the "reverse" discrimiation against white males today, it pales in comparison to the discrimination faced by non white males in the past. You guys sound like crybabies to me.

124 posted on 04/23/2005 11:44:47 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: staytrue
If you look at the "reverse" discrimiation against white males today, it pales in comparison to the discrimination faced by non white males in the past.

Yeah but we don't live in the past. Or maybe we live in an Orwellian future where everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.

132 posted on 04/23/2005 12:40:02 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: staytrue
Your comment sounds like someone with a chip on their shoulder.

Crybaby or not your entitled to you narrow minded, thoughtless and racist opinion.

Discrimination is wrong whether it is against any color.

Discrimination has not always been against non whites if you care to read up on the subject.

However, you evidently approve and think discrimination is OK as long as it's against whites.

Personally I am tired of all the racists minority groups that seem to abound all over America today screaming the need for civil rights at the expense of others.
137 posted on 04/23/2005 2:11:02 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (LL THE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: staytrue
If you look at the "reverse" discrimiation against white males today, it pales in comparison to the discrimination faced by non white males in the past. You guys sound like crybabies to me.

So because someone somewhere, somewhen, who was not white got a raw deal, it is okay for a nonwhite couple to use the courts to sieze this old white man's home so they can have a rental property?

Uh huh. I see where you are coming from.

Did you ever consider that rights aren't rights unless they apply to everyone? That tipping the scales the other way will only ensure there is yet another generation seeking 'paybacks' at some level.

If you want racial equality, then by all means, let's have it.

If you are claiming it is fair to take retribution against an individual over ills perpetrated by others of the same race in the past, you might want to rethink this whole conservative thing.

When this is done, I can guarantee you there will be at least two black people that that old man will feel fully justified in hating.

Whether he will limit his vitriol to those individuals or make generalizations is up to him, but those who are the type to generalize will use his case as an object one to support their beliefs, however wrong or twisted those generalized beliefs might be.

The net effect will only propagate racism, not eliminate it.

IMHO, the motivation here has little to do with racial equality, but instead is simple greed. Free house, and the money to pay for the abstract, deed transfer, and the lawyer.

By their fruits shall ye know them.

200 posted on 04/23/2005 10:42:22 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: staytrue
Think it'll be another 50-100 years of reverse racism before the "whitey's not paid enough" crowd are satisfied that retribution has been exacted?
219 posted on 04/24/2005 4:35:11 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson