If you look at the "reverse" discrimiation against white males today, it pales in comparison to the discrimination faced by non white males in the past. You guys sound like crybabies to me.
Yeah but we don't live in the past. Or maybe we live in an Orwellian future where everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.
So because someone somewhere, somewhen, who was not white got a raw deal, it is okay for a nonwhite couple to use the courts to sieze this old white man's home so they can have a rental property?
Uh huh. I see where you are coming from.
Did you ever consider that rights aren't rights unless they apply to everyone? That tipping the scales the other way will only ensure there is yet another generation seeking 'paybacks' at some level.
If you want racial equality, then by all means, let's have it.
If you are claiming it is fair to take retribution against an individual over ills perpetrated by others of the same race in the past, you might want to rethink this whole conservative thing.
When this is done, I can guarantee you there will be at least two black people that that old man will feel fully justified in hating.
Whether he will limit his vitriol to those individuals or make generalizations is up to him, but those who are the type to generalize will use his case as an object one to support their beliefs, however wrong or twisted those generalized beliefs might be.
The net effect will only propagate racism, not eliminate it.
IMHO, the motivation here has little to do with racial equality, but instead is simple greed. Free house, and the money to pay for the abstract, deed transfer, and the lawyer.
By their fruits shall ye know them.