Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rawhide; Strategerist; Herakles

I don't have a source, but I recall reading similar reports. The reports I read said there were better (more recent & complete) maps available commercially. Russians weren't mentioned. Later, I read something to the effect that they were given updates, and were expected to incorporate those updates into their maps (charts, whatever), but they didn't. That makes sense to me. I can't imagine the Navy would draw up all new maps every time a new feature is discovered.


26 posted on 04/23/2005 4:46:35 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Impeach Judge Greer - In memory of Terri Schindler <strike>Schiavo</strike> - www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: BykrBayb

Here's one, I don't have sourse of the orginal document I read;

"Assigning the blame for the collision is becoming an interesting exercise in how bureaucracies operate. Apparently a satellite ocean mapping project had spotted the sea mount, which the San Francisco hit, several years ago. But the navy never updated its charts."

Reference:http://www.strategypage.com/fyeo/howtomakewar/default.asp?target=htsub


35 posted on 04/23/2005 10:50:18 PM PDT by Herakles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson