Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Says Bolton Is Right Man for Job
Straight Talk Express | John McCain

Posted on 04/22/2005 11:55:46 AM PDT by meandog

Senator McCain's Floor Statement on the Nomination of John Bolton to be the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Unofficial Transcript As It Appears In The Congressional Record

"Mr. President, I rise to discuss the nomination of John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations. We all know, somewhat unexpectedly, Mr. Bolton's nomination has been held pending further discussion and consideration by the Foreign Relations Committee.

"I want to say I strongly support Mr. Bolton's nomination. He has been confirmed by the Senate four times in the past. He is a smart, experienced, hardworking, and talented man, and he knows the United Nations. He is not a career diplomat, but neither was Jean Kirkpatrick. He is not a career diplomat, either by profession or temperament, but then the role of ambassador to the U.N. has always required something special. A look back at some of the personalities who have held the job--from Adlai Stevenson to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, from Madeleine Albright, to Jean Kirkpatrick, to Richard Holbrooke--shows that directness and forcefulness are assets, not hindrances, to effectiveness there.

"We all know Mr. Bolton is perhaps not the world's most beloved manager, nor one to keep his temper entirely under wraps. Perhaps, Mr. President, that evokes a certain sympathy and empathy from this individual, although it is well known that on no occasion have I ever become emotionally involved in anything.

"I am sorry about a little levity here.

"Seriously, I ask my colleagues is it unique to Mr. Bolton to be strong in his views and opinions? If a temper and an unorthodox management style were disqualifiers from Government service, I would bet a large number of people in Washington would be out of a job.

"It is worth wondering not whether Mr. Bolton is a mild, genteel diplomat--we know he is not--but rather whether he is the representative we need at the United Nations. We need an ambassador who truly knows the U.N. We need an ambassador who is willing to shake up an organization that requires serious reform. No one knows better than the Senator from Minnesota, who is in the chair, who has been heavily involved in the issues of the U.N. We need an ambassador who has the trust of the President and the Secretary of State. Mr. Bolton , it seems to me, has what it takes for the job.

"I am reminded, on the judges issue and in this issue, elections do have consequences. I believe there are significant numbers of the American people who do take into consideration the consequences of a Presidential election, and that is the earned right of a President, under anything other than unusual circumstances, to pick his team. There were nominees of the previous Clinton administration I didn't agree with, I would not have selected but because President Clinton was elected President, I voted for his nominees on that basis.

"The U.N. is a vital organization to the world and to the national interests of the United States. It is not perfect by any means, and John Bolton knows this. There has been talk that the nomination of Mr. Bolton was an indication of the administration's disdain for multilateral diplomacy. I cannot believe Mr. Bolton wishes to be dispatched for 4 years to an ineffective body, unloved by the United States. I do believe he wants to work actively to reform the U.N., make it stronger and better. Mr. Bolton , seeing clearly the U.N.'s strengths and its weaknesses, will be well positioned to improve the organization and America's relationship with him.

"As the Chair well knows, what kind of a U.N. is it that has Libya, Cuba, and Zimbabwe as part of its Human Rights Commission? Is it all right with the U.N. today? We are seeing more and more indications of the Oil-for-Food scandal which, again, the Senator from Minnesota, the Chair, has carefully examined. There is a crying need for reform.

"I am pleased the Secretary General of the U.N. has made proposals for reform. I support those and believe perhaps we need more. Again, it seems to me Mr. Bolton sees clearly the strengths and weaknesses, and he would be well positioned to help in this reform effort. Let's not forget that it desperately needs improving. It is hard to take an organization that has countries such as I mentioned that are members of the Human Rights Commission or whose General Assembly equates Zionism with racism. But at the moment, a great opportunity presents itself. The panel named by the Secretary General, on which one of my most respected Americans and beloved Americans, Brent Scowcroft, served, has recently issued its list of recommendations to transform the U.N. Kofi Annan has presented his own serious plan to implement these recommendations.

"In other words, I argue that right now the U.N. is in a unique moment, perhaps, in its history; and because of the scandals associated with it, it is open to reform. We need a strong personality, in my view, and a knowledgeable one to help bring about those reforms.

"But without hard work and pressure, nothing will happen. Over the years, the U.N. has proven itself to be remarkably resistant to change. I believe John Bolton could provide the medicine the United Nations needs.

"As I mentioned earlier, elections have consequences, and one consequence of President Bush's reelection is he actually should have the right to select officials of his choice. I stress this because the President nominates not the Democrats' selection, nor mine, nor that of any other Senator, but his own choice. I mentioned that when President Clinton was elected, I didn't share the policy views of some of the officials he nominated, but I voted to confirm them, knowing the President has a right to put into place the team he believes will serve him best.

"The Foreign Relations Committee is examining whether Mr. Bolton has engaged in truly unacceptable behavior that would disqualify him for office. I believe, unless we see a pattern of inappropriate conduct--which so far I have not--I believe the Senate must move forward expeditiously to confirm John Bolton as America's ambassador to the United Nations.

"Mr. President, as I criticize some of the activities of the U.N., there are other activities of the U.N. going on as we speak that I think require America's presence. The situation in Darfur, Sudan, for example, is one that cries out for American participation in the decisionmaking process because one could draw a scenario where under extreme circumstances, to prevent genocide, American troops, or certainly American support in the form of logistics and other areas, could be heavily involved, as well as expenditure of American tax dollars, which already constitutes a significant portion of the financing of the United Nations.

"So I hope we can set a time and date certain for a vote on Mr. Bolton . As I said, if somebody has information that would disqualify him, that is fine. I don't think he or anybody else deserves a long, drawn-out, exhausting process which damages our ability to participate in the U.N. and also may damage the character of a good man.

"I hope we will act as expeditiously as possible. I have great respect for the Foreign Relations Committee and its chairman, Senator Lugar, all members, and the ranking member, Senator Biden. But I certainly hope they realize inordinate delay is not healthy. I, having had the opportunity of knowing Mr. Bolton for many years, believe he would do an outstanding job as our ambassador to the United Nations."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: bolton; mccain; mccrook; mcnut; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: meandog

What, you think this means McCain is just "misunderstood"?

The King Maverick infuriated the base at his attempts to sabotage the end to the Judicial filibuster. The King maverick is trying to get back on our good side by critising his new competition for the role of Beloved Maverick among the MSM by voicing support for Bolton when it matters little anyway since he isn't on that committee.

mcCain is a self serving opportunist that plays both sides. Hillary could learn from him, he's light years ahead of her in "moderating" his image.

I would wager mccain is also concerned we're going to make good on our threat to vote the mavericks out of office. And, he should be concerned.


41 posted on 04/22/2005 2:03:22 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Because he shows some party loyalty once, even though he should be showing it all the time, we should praise him?

I would rank loyalty to the people that voted for him as much more important than loyalty to the party, but that's just me.

42 posted on 04/22/2005 3:05:33 PM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: meandog
one day there may be a Democratic judge nominee and the only way to block it would be by filibuster...what's so wrong with that?

Only that it has never been done before these democrats starting using it on conservative judicial nominees!?

43 posted on 04/22/2005 3:35:27 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
No other sitting Senator has ever been asked to run as VeeP candidate(2004) for the opposing party except for John McLaim

If you reviewed your history before you posted that, you would have found among the examples: Andrew Johnson (Tennessee Democrat) who ran with none other than Abraham Lincoln (Illinois Republican).

44 posted on 04/22/2005 3:49:44 PM PDT by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
Lastly, I have no idea what you are talking about re him having a problem with the campaign funding. Is it about McCain-Feingold?

No, he was talking about the 501 money...you know the money that independants like Soros pumped to the RATS to try to trash Bush; it was the loophole in McCain-Finegold. It was what also got him riled about the Swifties in the first place...

45 posted on 04/22/2005 3:53:35 PM PDT by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: meandog

He called the Swifties "dishonest and dishonorable." They are no such thing, rather the exact opposite. How do you feel about McCain saying that?


46 posted on 04/22/2005 4:59:19 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: meandog

And yesterday, at the White House, McCain said he wouldn't back a change in the Senate rules and support the constitution (surprise, surprise) about filibustering of judicial nominations.

Being cynical and still hating McCain, this support for Bolton could have been a quid pro quo and Frist will never even go for a vote on filibusters regardless of Cheney's speech today.

McCain's ego is out of control. But that's okay, it will be worse on May 17 when "Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith" comes out. In it Luke and Leaha are born and soon McCain will be able to play young Skywalker bravely fighting his way out of the Death Star again!

May the Farce be with you. Always.


47 posted on 04/22/2005 5:04:01 PM PDT by Fledermaus (I have a big truck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
[ If you reviewed your history before you posted that, you would have found among the examples: Andrew Johnson (Tennessee Democrat) who ran with none other than Abraham Lincoln (Illinois Republican). ]

Your strawman is impotent.. and Viagra won't help..

48 posted on 04/22/2005 6:08:17 PM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Something's gone wrong in the world. You've got McCain supporting Bolton and Ted Olson essentially telling DeLay to cool it with the hot talk about the judges. Somebody pinch me and wake me up. If McCain says Bolton is ok, then there must be something wrong.


49 posted on 04/22/2005 6:11:36 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

He probably thinks Bolton's nomination is dead, so he feels he can afford to come out in support of him in an attempt to appease us conservatives, the very same people he thought he could piss all over in 2000, relying on RINOs and moderates to get him the GOP nomination.

Or else, he's trying to shake down the White House again.


50 posted on 04/22/2005 6:15:46 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nosofar
I would rank loyalty to the people that voted for him as much more important than loyalty to the party, but that's just me.

Sadly, it's not just you.

The job of a representative is to adhere to the principles of the platform he ran on. If he can't he should resign.

51 posted on 04/22/2005 9:02:15 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: job

hahahahahahaha...................


52 posted on 04/22/2005 10:21:46 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson