Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative cat

I still do not understand why, when Terri's feeding tube was pulled, the parents were not allowed to administer nourishment (liquids) by mouth.

If she could not swallow, what harm could it have done? And please don't say "IT COULD HAVE KILLED HER"

sp


27 posted on 04/22/2005 11:08:45 AM PDT by sodpoodle (sparrows are underrated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


Ping to self for pingout.


28 posted on 04/22/2005 11:11:14 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

That judge committed murder. You do not remove a feeding tube without offering food by mouth. To not do so, means you have chosen to starve that person and deny them food.

Same as locking a child in a cage and not feeding or providing water - murder.

And, based on not offering her food by mouth, he should be impeaced and removed from the bench.

We won't allow a U.N. ambassador to slam the phone down on a foreign dignitary but we allow a U.S. county judge to willfully kill a woman.

Another case of wrong is right, right is wrong - and a sign of the end times.


102 posted on 04/23/2005 9:32:07 AM PDT by ClancyJ (Florida Motto: Send me your weak, frail, elderly - and we will give them 'rest'".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson