Yes, I agree that this euthanasia movement has been very busy at work over the last 10 years getting laws written via the courts (starting with the Browning case)
http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/flsupct/74174/op-74174.pdf
Look at who one of the Petitioners was (George Felos) - they wrote law here. Felos is a very determined man to see his vision come to life. I suspect that he has the backing of the Scientologists, and we know how powerful they are based on what happened to Lisa McPherson. They were able to murder a girl and get away with it completely.
When the Fl. legislature tried to pass Terris Law they called it unconstitutional. This is a complete power grab by the judiciary - and all the courts in this country were on the take. So my take is that the euthanasia movement has complete say in what goes on in the state of Fl. via the Browning case and now the Shiavo case - anything the Legislature tries to do at this point regarding turning back the clock on who can be killed in Fl. will not succeed because the Fl. Supreme court will declare it unconstitutional. So the time to act was before she died, Jeb would have had to of caused a constitutional crises and he was not willing to do so - because apparently he would rather lay down his sword and let the judiciary walk all over him. So I am sure he did so on good advice - in that it was probably a lost battle to start with. And I blame the public most of all. They were swayed by the media and unfortunately because the public was not outraged by what happened the Governor, and the Republicans in Congress were left standing without an army. So I don't expect that things will change, cause at the very heart of this issue is that the public appears to want George Felos and company to allow the state to kill them when they become disabled and can't speak for themselves. If you live in Fl. beware.
Good post.
Another horrible thought is - could the Medicare/Medicaid administration be involved in this also to rid the rolls of "partakers" of their benefits? I wonder if Gov Bush found out something as he had his people search the files.
Maybe the corruption is so deep and dark that they backed off rather then broach it at that time. Of course, we can conjecture all day long.
But, we know something evil just went down and we are right to get our antenna really active. Now, we must keep on digging. They will not get away with murder again.
Felos and the other death lovers are anxious to see their vision come to life, as long as it is someone else being killed. I wish they would be the first ones to step up to the plate and take the needle. But they are cowards and only want to get their jollies by seeing someone else die.
When the Fl. legislature tried to pass Terris Law they called it unconstitutional. This is a complete power grab by the judiciary - and all the courts in this country were on the take.
When Congress wrote the law stipulating that the Schiavo case be places into the Federal judiciary system, I was pessimistic from the start that Terri Schindler would get any mercy from the judicial system of this country, be it state or federal. Remember that it is the judiciary, through tortured legal "reasoning", that has perpetuated the ongoing holocaust of abortion in this country. With the blood of going on fifty million on their hands, why would they stop when it came to killing Terri Schiavo?
There was no way any higher court would find against the initial court ruling. Why? Because to do so would have been to admit an error on the part of the judiciary in sentencing an innocent person to death. Once the courts started down the path of killing an innocent person, they couldn't turn back, because to find in favor of appeal would be to admit they were wrong in ordering that Terri be killed.
An interest historical aside for those students of history (like myself) who may be interested. This is exactly the argument used by the German judges tried at Nuremberg and ultimately found guilty of crimes against Humanity. To turn back from the road once started upon, to admit they were wrong to enable the Holocaust that cost six million innocent lives by upholding and administering what they knew to be unjust laws, would have been to admit to the world, and themselves, their complicity and guilt in such a monstrous and heinous crime. They argued that instead of justice they fell back on "enforcing the laws", and instead of justice they meted out "devotion to duty', which sounds an awful lot like the Circuit Court judge who talked about "dispassionate discharge of duty". Well, it didn't work at Nuremberg, and it won't work now, at least for those of us who understand that the law is not only about process but justice, and that "devotion to duty" and "dispassionate discharge of duty" must be tempered with the notions of basic decency, compassion, mercy, and wisdom.