Skip to comments.
Gay foster mothers fearing the worst
Dallas Morning News ^
| 4/22/2005
| Kim Horner
Posted on 04/22/2005 5:07:49 AM PDT by sinkspur
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-216 next last
1
posted on
04/22/2005 5:07:49 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
A couple at our church adopted a child a year or two ago. Of the 7 couples adopting kids that week, 4 couples were same sex. This is in Cedar Rapids Iowa.
2
posted on
04/22/2005 5:09:34 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(John 2:4 "Woman, what does your concern have to do with Me?...)
To: sinkspur
"I don't understand what is so wrong about what we're doing,"Then you can possibly teach the children what is so wrong with it......can you???
3
posted on
04/22/2005 5:10:31 AM PDT
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: sinkspur
"We're a normal family," Ms. Crumley said.
No you are not.
You are a mentally disturbed sexual pervert.
4
posted on
04/22/2005 5:11:15 AM PDT
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: expatguy
Is it better for children that nobody wants to grow up in group homes, or be fostered by a gay couple?
5
posted on
04/22/2005 5:13:12 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
To: sinkspur
""We would be devastated if we couldn't do this," Ms. Crumley said."
Then give up your perverted lifestyle. If your priorities are to live in perverted sexual behavior, then don't complain.
6
posted on
04/22/2005 5:13:28 AM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
If your priorities are to live in perverted sexual behavior, then don't complain. Their priorities seem to be to give children that nobody wants a home.
7
posted on
04/22/2005 5:15:36 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
To: sinkspur; MeekOneGOP; maeng; ValerieUSA; txflake; WinOne4TheGipper; DrewsDad; HiJinx; Gracey; ...
Wrong lifestyle ping....
The Texas Senate has this bill in the target zone and intend to kill it, as reported on the news this AM.
8
posted on
04/22/2005 5:17:07 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(TV News and the MSM - - - ROTFLMAO)
To: sinkspur
"I don't understand what is so wrong about what we're doing," Ms. Crumley said Wednesday evening You might think that there's nothing wrong, that you're teaching those kids open-mindedness and tolerance, but kids can sense when something is amiss from a mile off. They KNOW, even if they can't vocalize it or put words to their gut instincts, that this "family" is not normal.
BTW, I wonder what kind of church this couple attends? Unitarian Universalist, perhaps?
9
posted on
04/22/2005 5:17:28 AM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: sinkspur; Happy2BMe; All
"I don't understand what is so wrong about what we're doing,"
I posted an essay on my blog regarding cannabalism here in Southeast Asia on the island of Borneo.
Cannabals don't see or understand how what they are doing is wrong either.
The sad thing is that this womyn knows very well what she is doing is wrong. She trys desperately however (as many of these sex perverts do) to seek solice in the fact that secular law has allowed their to practice their selfish hedonistic debauchery for so long, but the void always remains unfilled.
Stop by and read ~
Moral Relativism in the Rainforest of Diversity
An American Expat in Southeast Asia
10
posted on
04/22/2005 5:18:07 AM PDT
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: expatguy
Is it better for children that nobody wants to grow up in group homes, or be fostered by a gay couple?
11
posted on
04/22/2005 5:20:07 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
To: sinkspur
Ms. Crumley and Ms. Sickles said they have provided a safe, loving home
I beg to differ, teaching children that gay sex and normal sex are equivalent lifestyles is not safe, just like teaching them that grown ups drink whiskey all day long, and should boink as many people as possible. I would feel sorry for a boy growing up there. Homosexual relations are inherently disordered. People don't have a human right to be foster parents. Texas has the right as a state to regulate this extreme practice.
It used to fall to Church orphanages to take care of children, but most of them are out of business, due to the state fostering atheistic homes and schools over faith based organizations.
12
posted on
04/22/2005 5:20:34 AM PDT
by
Dominick
("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
To: expatguy
Good post.
13
posted on
04/22/2005 5:21:07 AM PDT
by
Republic
(Our Father in Heaven touched the Pope, who KNEW of Terri, Terri got her mass, VATICAN STYLE!)
To: sinkspur
Is it better for children that nobody wants to grow up in group homes, or be fostered by a gay couple?
The answer is no.
And why a gay couple? Why not a couple of satanists or a couple of cannibals?
14
posted on
04/22/2005 5:21:41 AM PDT
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: sinkspur
You raise a valid issue that no one wants to address.
15
posted on
04/22/2005 5:23:53 AM PDT
by
verity
(A mindset is an antidote to logic.)
To: sinkspur
Would it be okay to give the children to child molestors? Drug users/dealers? Just give them to anyone who will take them so taxpayers don't have to support them? How about teaching responsibility to people who have these children and then dump them? Florida doesn't allow homosexuals to adopt children and I think it's a very wise thing. Do we want to promote the best interests of children or the so-called "rights" of homosexual perverts?
16
posted on
04/22/2005 5:26:29 AM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
Would it be okay to give the children to child molestors? Drug users/dealers? Just give them to anyone who will take them so taxpayers don't have to support them? How about teaching responsibility to people who have these children and then dump them? Florida doesn't allow homosexuals to adopt children and I think it's a very wise thing. Do we want to promote the best interests of children or the so-called "rights" of homosexual perverts? Why would putting children in group homes with other damaged children in their best interests vs. being parented in a family, where they can receive concentrated care and attention. Face it, few heterosexual, married couples want older children, particularly ones with "issues".
17
posted on
04/22/2005 5:30:32 AM PDT
by
LWalk18
To: sinkspur
Doesn't their desire to adopt or be foster homes, prove their opponents right? Isn't marriage really about procreation and family?
18
posted on
04/22/2005 5:31:47 AM PDT
by
CSM
To: sinkspur
I think that every child deserves a family.
Most of these childrens heterosexual parents abused, neglected and mistreated them. Many of them were born drug addicted.
These women are performing a much needed public service while at the same time giving these kids the family that they are lacking.
It is easy to say that they should not be allowed to foster. Then these kids would probably be sitting in some children's home somewhere waiting for the adoption that may never come. Sad.
To: verity; LWalk18
While not the optimum, being cared for in a home environment is preferable to being warehoused.
Every member of the Texas legislature who votes in favor of this bill should at least have the guts to put their names on a list to foster a child with behavioral problems.
Otherwise, the bill is just grandstanding.
20
posted on
04/22/2005 5:37:29 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-216 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson