To: js1138; PatrickHenry; Alamo-Girl
But if you want me to accept as fact the claim that ants do things that are inaccessible to known physical laws.... Many known physical laws have only been "known" for a relatively short time -- a couple/few centuries. With the above statement, are you suggesting (prophesizing???) that everything that can be "known" is now known, and therefore there is no possibility of additions to knowledge in the future?
What would science do with itself, if that were the case? Wouldn't scientists wake up at night screaming, in cold sweats, horrified and lamenting that they no longer have anything to do?
266 posted on
04/28/2005 11:26:52 AM PDT by
betty boop
(If everyone is thinking alike, then no one is thinking. -- Gen. George S. Patton)
To: betty boop
I see you aren't in any hurry to reveal your source for your beekeeper story.
268 posted on
04/28/2005 11:31:58 AM PDT by
js1138
(e unum pluribus)
To: betty boop
Here's a brief article, with a pic, about a bee releasing a pheromone into the air to attract other bees:
Nasonov pheromone. The article doesn't say, but I assume the "field" that carries the "message" is nothing more esoteric than the air.
270 posted on
04/28/2005 11:44:50 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson