Why do you say that? An expectation about what Creation is supposed to look like is an a priori philosophical or theological premise rather than a scientific argument.
Cordially,
Why do you say that? An expectation about what Creation is supposed to look like is an a priori philosophical or theological premise rather than a scientific argument.
Intelligent Design in capitals is a movement that argues that it has a scientific model for life on Earth that best fits the current data (fossil record, genetics, etc).
Yet this proposed Intelligent Design model is so general and vague that it would actually fit any set of data, not just the set that actually is.
This means that no matter what discoveries are made in the future it is not possible that they would challenge Intelligent Design. Therefore Intelligent Design is not testable and so isn't science, as even hypothese in science must be testable (ie potentially falsifiable) given future data.