Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOD APPROVES LOCKHEED MARTIN F/A-22 RAPTOR AIRCRAFT FOR FULL-RATE PRODUCTION
Lockheed Martin Press Release ^ | April 19, 2005

Posted on 04/21/2005 7:14:51 PM PDT by iso

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2005 7:14:54 PM PDT by iso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iso

OUTSTANDING!


2 posted on 04/21/2005 7:15:35 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iso

About bloody time. I thought that I would reach retirement age before congress moved on this aircraft.


3 posted on 04/21/2005 7:17:00 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (I am sick of brownshirts in black robes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iso

Ratchet it on up...air dominance.

4 posted on 04/21/2005 7:22:19 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Really, awesome technology.

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2005/04/raptor-wins-aprroval-for-full-rate.html


5 posted on 04/21/2005 7:22:24 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: iso
F/A-22 F119-PW-100 F/A-22's APG-77 AESA F/A-22's Weapon M61A2 AIM-120C AIM-9X HARM GBU-32 GBU-22 III JASSM WCMD SDB
6 posted on 04/21/2005 7:25:09 PM PDT by iso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iso
More...


7 posted on 04/21/2005 7:26:28 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iso

> The F/A-22's balanced design of stealth, supercruise
> speed, supportability and super-agility, along with
> its advanced integrated avionics, will enable combat
> commanders to change the way future wars are fought.

It might have been impolitic of them to point out that,
despite the description given to the F-117, the F/A-22
is actually our first "stealth fighter". The F-117,
perhaps oughta have been called the A-117, as it has
no significant air-to-air capability.

That deficiency hasn't mattered so far, because all the
opponents to date haven't had serious airforces (or
any airforce, for long after hostilities commenced).

China might have considerable a-a threats, by the time
the PRC-ROC tension finally boils over. We may yet
need the F/A-22.

With any luck, the software will be mostly debugged by
then.


8 posted on 04/21/2005 7:26:38 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iso


9 posted on 04/21/2005 7:28:20 PM PDT by iso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: iso

I'm sure Bejing is thrilled ;)
How do you say tough nuggies in Chinese!


10 posted on 04/21/2005 7:28:32 PM PDT by ProudVet77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
"About bloody time. I thought that I would reach retirement age before congress moved on this aircraft."

No kidding... I knew a pilot in training - in '94 he was told the Raptor would be delivered in '97. I think they lied just to recruit him.

11 posted on 04/21/2005 7:29:13 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
I thought that I would reach retirement age before congress moved on this aircraft.

I think the approval for full rate production came from the DOD after the completion of Operational Testing. I don't think Congress was involved.

12 posted on 04/21/2005 7:29:57 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
About bloody time. I thought that I would reach retirement age before congress moved on this aircraft.

I worked on the radar for the F-22 for about five years before I retired in 1991.

13 posted on 04/21/2005 7:31:23 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head


14 posted on 04/21/2005 7:32:53 PM PDT by iso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
I think the approval for full rate production came from the DOD after the completion of Operational Testing. I don't think Congress was involved.

The Congress has been responsible for delaying full rate production for at least a decade, by cutting funding.

15 posted on 04/21/2005 7:33:09 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Yes it is. What I have always found fascinating is that in one aspect, everything that was old is new. By this I am referring to the internal weapons bay for fighters. This concept was first expressed in the F-102/F-106. Who would have thought, back then, that the internal weapons bay would return as an element of stealthiness.


16 posted on 04/21/2005 7:33:38 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (I am sick of brownshirts in black robes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

I have kept tabs on this aircraft since it was first revealed to the public as the YF-22. The Donkey boys have done everything to kill it aside from outright sabotage. The Congress found new ways to play with budget lines for it. Finally, the aircraft has the green light.


17 posted on 04/21/2005 7:37:59 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (I am sick of brownshirts in black robes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: iso

Gotta love it. The Ruskies and ChiComms air planners are going to have some sleepless nights...and well they should.


18 posted on 04/21/2005 7:38:17 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
"With any luck, the software will be mostly debugged by then."

They'd better get it down. Next generation of fighter won't even have pilots on board, most likely.

19 posted on 04/21/2005 7:39:00 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iso


20 posted on 04/21/2005 7:39:03 PM PDT by iso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson