Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasCajun
U.S. Defends Sealing Charges Against Former Hillary Rodham Clinton Aide David Rosen

3/02/05

Federal prosecutors are battling attempts to dismiss their criminal case against Hillary Rodham Clinton's former fund-raising director, claiming in a court motion that they kept the indictment of him secret for more than a year to protect the identity of a witness cooperating in a separate investigation.

The defendant, David Rosen, is charged with failing to report in-kind contributions and producing a false invoice in connection with an Aug. 12, 2000, fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton, according to an indictment unsealed in January. He has pleaded not guilty.

The government's motion, filed in federal court in Los Angeles on Monday, was in response to papers filed in February by Mr. Rosen's lawyer arguing that the case should be dismissed because the government had no justifiable reason for sealing the indictment until January and because it had erroneously brought the charges in California rather than in Washington, where the campaign finance reports were filed with the Federal Election Commission.

The papers also said that Mr. Rosen's indictment cited a law that applies to false statements made to a government agency, and the F.E.C. is not one.

Paul Mark Sandler, Mr. Rosen's lawyer, said yesterday, "We've received the government's replies and we're reviewing them closely."

Bryan Sierra, a spokesman for the Department of Justice, would not comment on the case.

The government's motion gave little indication of the nature of the other investigation or the identity of the witness. One cause for the delay may have been efforts to reach an agreement with an organizer of the fund-raiser, Peter Paul, to be a witness in the case. Mr. Paul's role would be complicated by stock fraud charges pending against him in connection with Stan Lee Media, a failed Internet company that he co-founded.

~snip~

16 posted on 04/21/2005 12:06:39 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
I was thinking this Peter Paul was the Confidential Witness/Informant?

This makes it sounds like it's someone else? ...should be very, very interesting!

Let's just watch to see if our Girly-Men representatives and senators roll over on this one! ...sissy girls included Kay!

17 posted on 04/21/2005 12:16:18 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
Bryan Sierra...Bryan Sierra...??? Not Bravo Sierra...?
129 posted on 04/21/2005 3:12:49 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (You get more with a gun and a smile than just a smile itself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
Bryan Sierra, a spokesman for the Department of Justice, would not comment on the case.

So there's someone who works for the govt with the name of Bryan Sierra?

Maybe he could get his first name changed from Bryan to Bravo.

Too funny.

161 posted on 04/21/2005 6:14:41 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson