Posted on 04/21/2005 5:07:58 AM PDT by Puppage
(Hartford, Conn.-AP, Apr. 21, 2005 6:00 AM) _ Gay rights proponents had been hoping that Connecticut would follow the lead of neighboring Massachusetts by allowing same-sex couples to marry.
That's why they were pleased but still unsatisfied Wednesday when Connecticut offered civil unions to gay couples, becoming the first state to do so voluntarily, without being forced by the courts.
"As important as the rights are, this is not yet equality," said Anne Stanback, executive director of Love Makes a Family, a statewide gay rights organization.
Vermont is the other state to allow civil unions, which carry the rights and privileges of marriage without the marriage license. Massachusetts allows gay couples to marry. But those changes came about after same-sex couples won court battles.
Gov. M. Jodi Rell, a Republican, signed the bill about an hour after it was approved 26-8 by the Democrat-controlled Senate. The law, which takes effect Oct. 1, includes an amendment that defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. Civil unions are reserved only for same-sex couples.
"I have said all along that I believe in no discrimination of any kind and I think that this bill accomplishes that, while at the same time preserving the traditional language that a marriage is between a man and a woman," Rell said.
According to the 2000 census, there are 7,400 same-sex couples in Connecticut.
Jeffrey Busch, who lives in Wilton, said he would likely take advantage of the law and engage in a civil union with his partner, Stephen Davis.
"But we're not going to celebrate a civil union like a marriage," said Busch, an administrative law judge in New York. "If it had everything a marriage has, it would be called a marriage."
Busch and Davis are one of seven same-sex couples who sued in Connecticut last summer after being denied marriage licenses; the case has not been resolved.
Some gay marriage proponents say the new law means they will have to wait awhile before asking the state Legislature to revisit the issue and consider gay marriage.
"I think we are all going to have to step back and take a deep breath and realize that we need to understand the world is not going to change as the result of this legislation," said Democratic Sen. Andrew McDonald, co-chairman of the Judiciary Committee and one of a handful of openly gay legislators.
"We'll have an opportunity to see how it unfolds as unions start in October of this year," said McDonald, who supports Connecticut opening its marriage laws to same-sex couples.
Opponents had hoped to persuade Rell to veto the bill, saying civil unions are essentially gay marriage.
Roman Catholics and pro-marriage activists plan a rally Sunday in opposition to the bill.
Marie Hilliard, executive director of the Connecticut Catholic Conference, said the civil union proposal "got more legs than we ever hoped it would get." About 44 percent of the state's 3 million residents are Roman Catholic.
Brian Brown, head of the Family Institute of Connecticut, said his group intends to keep the issue squarely before the public.
"From now until 2006, our mission will be to let every person know in the state of Connecticut which lawmakers voted to redefine marriage, and which lawmakers voted to protect marriage," he said.
Connecticut homo's...Is'nt that special?
ping.
We need a referendum question for the 2008 ballot. If an informed group could find out the impact, ie. higher insurance, reduction of income tax collection, we could show how this hurts us in the form of high taxes for normal people.
I heard there's a rally in Hartford this weekned. The race is Saturday night, so I may be available if my daughters don't have thier Lacrosse jamboree. Anyone have any details?
Do the couplings require license and subsequent consumation to be 'valid'? LOL
LOL
Anne, You will never achieve "equality" because what you are trying to pass off as a family is not the same as a "natural" family, with a man and women committed to each other as parents. You can jump up and down and scream all you want, but the imitation families you are trying to pass off as real families are just not the same, they are not "equal".
Anne, your idea of family is different, it's not the same, it's not equal, it's "queer", "get used to it."
So then, they're going to "keep pushing until they're statisfied".
That shouldn't be surprising.
Because if it were allowed they would lose the vote.
I agree, but even that didn't stop the San Francisico mayor from performing illegal ceremonies earlier this year. I guess he just knows better.
Liberals are all smarter than we homophobes out in flyover country.
LOL. And, more caring ,too.
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Later today if I can sneak the time I'll post my list of quotes from homosexual spokespeople revealing that they REALLY want "gay" marriage so as to destroy the meaning of marriage and family. They want to destroy the social fabric. They want to destroy the timeless foundation of society which is the natural family.
Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
Several years after they are defeated...if ever.
There are times I think that people will not be happy until sodomy is required learning in school.
In some school districts it already is, and it is required by the courts via the ACLU! And not just sodomy, but how lesbians can and do have sex.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.