I've read it and see no problem. What is the problen, in your own words?
My point is that there is much dissention within the evolutionary sciences and yet our kids are shoveled this as fact. Our feathered friends' "ancestors" are a case in point. Even one of the "most important fossil finds" is argued over by the same people who are pushing the Darwinist theories - some say bird, some say "transitional", some say dinosaur.
The article you linked shows exactly my point: the writer spends pages trying to support his theories on Archaeopteryx and cites numerous dissenting theories doing so. Most of these opposing theories are scientists from his pro-evolution community.
Why then does this uncertainty not make it into textbooks? Doesn't it strike you as a bit dishonest to teach something as fact when the scientists themselves don't agree that it is fact?