[MissAmericanPie]

The same hand cuffs you place on Creationist in the way you pose your question and your rules regarding what you will accept for an answer, can fit just as well on Evolutionists. I can demand the same "objective evidence" from you, throwing out any interest in your science books, flawed carbon dating system, and your "faith" in the infallibility of scientific observation, methodology, and scientific opinion.

What Creationists are demanding is more honesty regarding the fallibility of the methods science uses to base and measure their findings. For instance, how did crystals trap 218 Po without the parent uranium halo? The polonium isotope has a half life of only three minutes, yet it is found trapped inside crystals.

The lava flow that ran into the Grand Canyon measures older than the bottom of the Grand Canyon which is impossible. Science seems to be stuck in a situation in which all data must be shoved, tweaked, and molded to fit into a preconceived paradigm. That is what is being called on the carpet, and the answers have not been forth coming.

[js1138]

Carbon dating can't be done on rocks.

[dread78645]

The lava flow that ran into the Grand Canyon measures older than the bottom of the Grand Canyon ...

Alert the media!

The lava flows came from the mantle, -- of course it's older than the basalt at the bottom of the canyon.