Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BMCDA
No. I'm not on the wrong track.

I'm looking for scientific evidence......empirical proof that evolution occurred.

So far, I haven't seen any.

Since you seem so certain that you are stating facts, I mistakenly assumed you had proof that what you were saying was accurate, and not just guesswork.

192 posted on 04/21/2005 3:31:12 PM PDT by ohioWfan ("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan
No, you are on the wrong track.

Tribune7's question was why we don't observe something which according to the theory of evolution doesn't happen. Got it so far?

Assuming arguendo that evolution is true, we get a nested hierarchy, i.e. a tree-like structure. Now if you pick one branch from this tree and assign it to a certain category then every branch that sprouts from the original branch is a subset of this category.
So what Tribune7 demands is that such a new branch should be a member of a different superset. But this can only happen if two twigs which originate from branches that diverged a long time ago intersect. An example of this would be a dog giving birth to a cat. This however, contradicts the nested hierarchy predicted by the theory of evolution.

Current canines can change but they will still be classified as canines. It may be necessary to introduce new categories but these categories will remain a subset of the canine category.

196 posted on 04/21/2005 4:13:34 PM PDT by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson