[Tribune7]

Do you have enough faith in forensic science to execute people based on theories?

I would not have faith to execute someone solely on the claims of a scientist. Few would. That's why there are trials.

Do you think TOE should be required to meet the standards of a criminal trial?

[js1138]

I would not have faith to execute someone solely on the claims of a scientist. Few would. That's why there are trials.

When there are no witnesses to a crime, what kind of evidence do you suppose the jury sees? Do the prosecutors bring in a priest or psychick to testify as to what happened, or do they bring in forensic experts.

Do you think TOE should be required to meet the standards of a criminal trial?

TOE has survived 145 years of cross examination. During that time the best the opposition has been able to do is point out that we don't have witnesses, and a lot of evidence has been lost to time. No alternate theory capable of being tested has been presented.