I have a professional interest in the rule of law.
Peddle your rule of law where death mongers and murderers will appreciate it. You'd have supported the rule of law that made Black people sit at the back of the bus and drink out of different water fountains from white people, too, I'm sure. Just following orders, sir, just following orders.
So murder is just fine in your book as long as it follows the rule of law.
Well - so do we - especially when the law is set up to kill some of us.
How's this for "rule of law"?
1. She was awarded 1.4 million dollars by a jury for treatment and therapy. Court records indicate NONE of those funds were expended to that purpose. Court records indicate $350,000 of those funds were expended to litigate her death.
2. She was sentenced to death without representation. The closest representation was the guardians ad litem, both of whose recommendations for further investigation of her wishes were dismissed by the court.
3. She was placed in a hospice for five years without a terminal illness. Hospice laws, policies and procedures require a terminal diagnosis and short life expectancy prognosis. A hospice is equipped to assist the dying. It is not equipped or purposed to provide for the living – the disabled living.
4. Terri Schiavo was declared indigent at some point during that time. Taxpayers funded her stay at a facility not purposed to her needs.
"I have a professional interest in the rule of law."
I presume you mean Felos' and Greer's personal versions, NOT the Constitution, nor the law observed by Judges like Judge Wilson, in his dissenting opinion.
http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200511556.pdf
You are merely dressing up your desire to kill all defenseless disabled people in the veneer of the rule of law.
"(Ignorance should be painful.) "
====
Careful what you wish for...
Here’s where Terri Schiavo Insurance money went:
These funds, the result of a malpractice suit, were meant solely to provide for Terri Schiavo’s care and rehabilitation.