Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tribes win case against government
Casper Star Tribune ^ | April 19, 2005 | BRODIE FARQUHAR

Posted on 04/20/2005 7:59:39 PM PDT by tomball

LANDER -- Wind River Indian Reservation tribes could realize about $6.5 million in federal payments after the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to consider the government's appeal of a lower-court ruling in favor of the tribes.

Earlier this month, the Bush administration argued the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone tribes waited too long to sue the Interior Department over federal management of minerals on the reservation dating back nearly 60 years.

Without comment, justices let stand the lower-court ruling that allowed most of the claims by the Wyoming tribes. The tribes allege the federal government mismanaged oil, gas, timber and grazing royalties from 1946 to 1973.

An attorney for the tribes, speaking on condition of anonymity, estimated an ultimate payment of $6.5 million to the tribes from the Interior Department.

The refusal of the Supreme Court to reopen the case, the tribal attorney said, secures a $12 million payment received last year, as well as additional interest, at a rate yet to be determined.

"My general estimate is that the tribes will see a payment of $6 million, by settlement or negotiation, within the next six months," the attorney said.

The $6 million anticipated payment arises from an accounting of oil and gas royalties owed the tribes, but not enforced by the federal government, from 1973 to 2000, he said.

In addition, and as a separate issue, the Supreme Court's denial of the federal appeal sets the stage for an additional $550,000 payment to the tribes, based on an earlier settlement about sand and gravel royalties, he said.

The attorney readily acknowledged that compared to a potential federal liability of $200 billion in a class-action trust management lawsuit (Cobell v. Norton), this victory for the Wind River tribes is relatively minor.

"It is good for the tribes," he said, but was uncertain whether it will have any implications for the larger lawsuit, potentially affecting 500,000 American Indians.



Background

Ordinarily, fraud claims have a six-year time limit for filing suit. But a federal statute allows the tribes to postpone that deadline if the government hasn't provided an accounting of the trust funds set up on their behalf. The Interior Department has not done that yet.

At issue was the scope of the federal law allowing the delayed claims if they concern "losses to or mismanagement of trust funds."

The tribes argued that should include alleged mismanagement of natural resources, such as failure to negotiate adequate prices for sand and gravel leases, that they say devalued their trust fund. The government disagreed and argued they should be limited to mismanagement of funds actually contained in the trust accounts.

In a ruling last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit staked a middle ground. It allowed claims involving the actual trust funds as well as alleged losses due to the government's failure to collect payments under sand and gravel payments. But it rejected the tribes' claims of losses due to inadequate negotiation of lease prices.

The Justice Department had urged the Supreme Court to hear the appeal, arguing that the lower ruling "will revive long-moribund claims and substantially increase the potential liability and litigation burdens of the United States."

In 1887, Congress created a trust fund for Indians managed by the government.

 



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: govwatch; mineralrights; propertyrights

1 posted on 04/20/2005 7:59:42 PM PDT by tomball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tomball

I want to understand how the BIA hasn't been completely purged. How can such incompetence go on so long? Why is it that the feds will make these payouts and the bureaucrats are still doing the same old same old?


2 posted on 04/20/2005 9:26:29 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball
There has been ongoing lawsuits for years with the tribes
suing the govt for mismanagement of Indian trust funds. Humongous projects have been ongoing in places like Albuquerque and Kansas to go back and record thousands of documents between Indians and the govt (some of these documents are dated in the 1800's).

I don't know if it will ever get settled. You almost wonder if the govt is keeping it in litigation to keep from forking over all the billions the Indians say they are owed.
3 posted on 04/20/2005 11:50:59 PM PDT by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball
How can there be a "time limit" on these things. My tribe had a judgment against the Government many years ago. It took us almost 20 year of the government stalling us to even get on a court calendar. Once we did though we won a large settlement. Then, it took them another 5 years to pay us. In the mean time I lost my great grandmother, my grandfather and grandmother etc. They are the ones that were really owed the money. When I really get pissed is when someone says," why did you get money, you didn't do anything". My answer to that is, when your family dies, who gets their house,land, etc.
4 posted on 04/21/2005 12:36:31 AM PDT by fish hawk (I am only one, but I am not the only one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball
Personally, I think that anyone who wins such a lawsuit against the federal government should have the ability to charge the same interest, fines and have the same rights as the IRS does in collecting debt owed.

While I wouldn't want the President's limo seized, there are plenty of government drones in the BIA and the Department of the Interior who could do with their perks being taken away in compensation.
5 posted on 04/21/2005 12:41:24 AM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball

Why did they have to have a trial to determine if there was government mismanagement? Isn't that a given?


6 posted on 04/21/2005 4:42:06 AM PDT by Woodworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson