To: TexasGreg
Another thing. He was NOT fined for yawning. He was fined for both the yawn AND his subsequent responses to the judge. Had he simply said, "I'm sorry your honor" after the judge said something to him, there would have been no fine.
16 posted on
04/20/2005 2:36:24 PM PDT by
mcg1969
To: mcg1969
In other words, if he had been sufficiently servile, there would have been no fine.
Wonderful.
17 posted on
04/20/2005 3:01:21 PM PDT by
Rifleman
To: mcg1969
Another thing. He was NOT fined for yawning. He was fined for both the yawn AND his subsequent responses to the judge. Had he simply said, "I'm sorry your honor" after the judge said something to him, there would have been no fine.
And, yet, the Judge's statements concerning the case all had to do with the disrespect which the YAWN demonstrated for his court. From the way the report reads it sounds like the judge was questioning WHY he yawned. Should he have LIED? That's contempt of court too. Or, perhaps you think that he should have used one of the other excuses offered up here?
25 posted on
04/21/2005 7:30:39 AM PDT by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
To: mcg1969
Another thing. He was NOT fined for yawning. He was fined for both the yawn AND his subsequent responses to the judge. Had he simply said, "I'm sorry your honor" after the judge said something to him, there would have been no fine.
And, yet, the Judge's statements concerning the case all had to do with the disrespect which the YAWN demonstrated for his court. From the way the report reads it sounds like the judge was questioning WHY he yawned. Should he have LIED? That's contempt of court too. Or, perhaps you think that he should have used one of the other excuses offered up here?
26 posted on
04/21/2005 7:30:39 AM PDT by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
To: mcg1969
Another thing. He was NOT fined for yawning. He was fined for both the yawn AND his subsequent responses to the judge. Had he simply said, "I'm sorry your honor" after the judge said something to him, there would have been no fine.
And, yet, the Judge's statements concerning the case all had to do with the disrespect which the YAWN demonstrated for his court. From the way the report reads it sounds like the judge was questioning WHY he yawned. Should he have LIED? That's contempt of court too. Or, perhaps you think that he should have used one of the other excuses offered up here?
27 posted on
04/21/2005 7:30:39 AM PDT by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson