Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile

I think you have just demonstrated the real reason these nominees are being opposed.

It is a balance of power issue.

When Rehnquist retires, there will not be must trouble with his replacement. That will simply be maintaing the current balance. Nor will the chief justice really cause much difficulty....again...it would simply be a replacement conservative.

However, when O'Conner quits all heck's gonna break loose.

This is the same dynamic, apparently, that's taking place on these circuits. The balance of power is changing.


8 posted on 04/21/2005 6:43:48 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Don't bet that there will 'not be much trouble' with Rehnquist's replacement. Rehnquist is a party hack. He could be replaced with a conservative. That would be three on the court. That could be REAL trouble on some issues.

It is to be devoutly hoped that O'Connor and Ginsberg both leave the bench in the next four years. Neither is worth a damn. Both could be replaced by far better conservative women.

I personally would like to see Alex Kozinski on the Supreme Court, but that's just me. I like the idea of a justice with a sense of humor. That guy's a riot. Plus, he's been on The Dating Game. Twice. Won once, too.


9 posted on 04/21/2005 4:52:27 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson