To: killjoy
As a photographer, I like the shot a lot.I don't see anything wrong with the picture other than I think they could have used warmer lighting.
94 posted on 04/18/2005 10:04:59 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
I heard that her first complaint about the Time story was the picture of her they used, proving that Ms. Coulter is first of all, a woman.
To: killjoy
As a photographer, I like the shot a lot.I don't see anything wrong with the picture other than I think they could have used warmer lighting.
94 posted on 04/18/2005 10:04:59 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
The more serious complaint should be that Time cropped the photo on page 34 of its April 25 edition (Ann Coulter) to falsely create the impression that it was showing anti-Coulter, anti-Bush protestors, when the "protestors" were actually pro-Bush, pro-Coulter. Specifically, it cropped out the actual captions of the signs, which read "Communists for Kerry," "Criminals for Gun Control," and "Liberating Iraqi Children from Tyranny is Costing too Much."
Ironically, Time is either caught in a Dan Rather moment of creating fake news by careful cropping of a photo or a Dan Rather moment of being so biased that it can't see what is plainly in front of its face.
Here is the original photo: http://i.timeinc.net/time/covers/1101050425/gallery/photos/photo08.jpg
Here is a scan of what is in the magazine:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/Chucklebuck/misc/timemag.jpg
The more serious complaint should be that Time cropped the photo on page 34 of its April 25 edition (Ann Coulter) to falsely create the impression that it was showing anti-Coulter, anti-Bush protestors, when the "protestors" were actually pro-Bush, pro-Coulter. Specifically, it cropped out the actual captions of the signs, which read "Communists for Kerry," "Criminals for Gun Control," and "Liberating Iraqi Children from Tyranny is Costing too Much."
Ironically, Time is either caught in a Dan Rather moment of creating fake news by careful cropping of a photo or a Dan Rather moment of being so biased that it can't see what is plainly in front of its face.
Here is the original photo: http://i.timeinc.net/time/covers/1101050425/gallery/photos/photo08.jpg
Here is a scan of what is in the magazine:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/Chucklebuck/misc/timemag.jpg
