Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juror Fined For Yawning In Court
The Associated Press ^ | Copyright 2005 | The Associated Press

Posted on 04/20/2005 8:54:40 AM PDT by Bigfitz

LOS ANGELES -- A juror was cited for contempt and fined $1,000 by a judge for yawning loudly while awaiting questioning in an attempted murder trial. The fine later was reduced to $100.

The yawn came after the man, identified as Juror No. 2386 in an April 1 court transcript, had been sitting in a courtroom for two days as part of jury selection.

"You yawned rather audibly there. As a matter of fact, it was to the point that it was contemptuous," Superior Court Judge Craig Veals said.

"I'm sorry, but I'm really bored," the juror said.

"I'm sorry?" the judge responded.

When the juror repeated his statement, he was admonished by the judge for having a "lousy" attitude.

"Your boredom just cost you $1,000 I'm finding you in contempt," Veals said. "Are you quite so bored now?"

The judge later called the yawn disruptive.

"I can't run a court when I have someone behaving the way you did," Veals said.

The juror paid the fine after it was reduced to $100. Ultimately, he was questioned but not selected for the trial.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: contempt; govwatch; idiot; judge; judicial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: mc5cents

"Please, use the word crepitate. It is so much more dignified."




I prefer "expel flatus."


61 posted on 04/20/2005 10:17:37 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

I do see your point- I just think the present system is wrong, and to your argument that it might produce a bad system I say: Look at the current system- can it be worse than this?

I can't afford to take off for potentially weeks or months for a tiral- so I could never be a juror- but I would sign up to be considered for 'paid' service...

I think the cost would be less than all the wasted time and money in the current system, result in speedier trials, and the result would be no worse than the current system (hopefully better)

I am open to other suggestions...


62 posted on 04/20/2005 10:25:25 AM PDT by Mr. K (All your UFO are belong to us (gosh I miss that))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Look at the current system- can it be worse than this?

Yes, it can, frankly. What would happen if a non-profit "activist organization" emerged which submitted groups of applicants to become paid jurors, in order to enact Social Justice? ("Remember, when you're a juror, always vote to acquit, because the police are The Man, and this is your chance to fight back." "Remember, always vote against big corporations." "Remember, always vote against the Radical Christians who are Trying to Destroy America.")

At this point, a random draw is basically the best we can do.

63 posted on 04/20/2005 10:37:44 AM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: monday
Are you kidding? He deserves to be fined for telling the truth? What should he have said?

How about "excuse me", which would be short for "excuse me for disrupting this public proceeding".

Sheesh. People around here complain about popular exclusion from the judicial process, and then complain about having to participate.

64 posted on 04/20/2005 10:39:55 AM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me
How much to call the judge an a-hole?

I've told several that they are corrupt to their faces in open court. Never been held in contempt. Was threatened with it once, but the judge wasn't going to go there; mostly because he knew I wanted to be held in contempt.

65 posted on 04/20/2005 11:08:21 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni
"How about "excuse me", which would be short for "excuse me for disrupting this public proceeding"."

sigh.... the only person who disrupted the proceeding was the judge, who made a big deal over nothing.
66 posted on 04/20/2005 11:14:56 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

(In Nelson's voice)
HA HA

I'm currently on a fed Civil case - $40 a day plus milage AND parking!

While it's somewhat peeved me to learn the amount was so high, I just think of it as a bonus tax return :)


67 posted on 04/20/2005 11:30:13 AM PDT by PissAndVinegar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: navygal
Hmmm be charged in contempt, for being odorously offensive?
68 posted on 04/20/2005 11:30:33 AM PDT by Bottom_Gun (Crush depth dummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

OK I'll go for that-
total RANDOM DRAW
but the pay would have to be better thanthe $5 a day they give now. When was that established? 1800?


69 posted on 04/20/2005 12:27:37 PM PDT by Mr. K (All your UFO are belong to us (gosh I miss that))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Maybe a punk, but that pissy little judge might have gotten a good ole FU from a lot of folks.


70 posted on 04/20/2005 12:31:06 PM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
but the pay would have to be better thanthe $5 a day they give now. When was that established? 1800?

It varies by locality; some pay more than others. In some places, you are excused from jury duty if your employer won't treat it as paid vacation.

71 posted on 04/20/2005 12:32:09 PM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

It makes me sick to my stomoach that a judge (or anyone for that matter) can have such powers.


72 posted on 04/20/2005 12:34:27 PM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; Lazamataz; bigsigh
Why stop there? Why not

And while we're at it, fine jewelers!

73 posted on 04/20/2005 12:36:14 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal
It makes me sick to my stomoach that a judge (or anyone for that matter) can have such powers.

Schoolchildren are annoyed when teachers try to keep order, too.

74 posted on 04/20/2005 12:49:07 PM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

that'll be fine


75 posted on 04/20/2005 1:23:23 PM PDT by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: PissAndVinegar

< Um...you are paid when you serve on a Jury >


Let me be more clear...let's have "professional" juries. You know, as in payed a salary...not $12 a day. It's not a new idea. The idea gets tossed about ocassionally.


76 posted on 04/20/2005 1:38:13 PM PDT by GOP_Proud (...stumbling across Bill Bennett on the radio is like bumping into Socrates at Starbucks.-K.Parker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Proud
Last time I was in a jury selection pool, I saw that they excused an engineer, a college statistics professor, a doctor, and a retired AF Chief Master Sargent.

Seems the defense and prosecution don't want anyone on the jury capable of critical, independent, thinking. If you have a working BS detector, you are not wanted or needed.

Yeah . . . that's who I want on my jury. 12 folks who know nothing of logic, cause and effect, critical thinking, no, I'd much rather have 12 folks who believe in the world according to Oprah. /sarcasm

Best Regards

Sergio
77 posted on 04/20/2005 1:52:38 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: neutrality
He deserves to be fined for that stupid reply

The reply was less than brilliant, though depending upon voicing may or may not have been condescending. A more general question would be whether it is good for jurors to be worn out with boredom even before a trial begins.

78 posted on 04/20/2005 3:47:37 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

"I prefer "expel flatus.""

I don't know why but that line really tickled my funny bone.

I have a fun toy called a "fart machine" It's especially funny in crowded elevators. I could have a blast with it in that judges courtroom.


79 posted on 04/20/2005 4:29:20 PM PDT by tuffydoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; All
at least he didnt have to spend the weekend in jail Girl, 17, jailed for ringing phone
80 posted on 04/20/2005 4:58:58 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (If you want to change goverment support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson