[Dan Evans]

From PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER v. ROBINS: "The California Supreme Court reversed, holding that the California Constitution protects speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in shopping centers even when the center is privately owned, and that such result does not infringe appellants' property rights protected by the Federal Constitution."

But I wonder if it would violate the McCain Feingold act if someone was using your property for political purposes within 60 days of an election. Who would be fined? The property owner who wasn't allowed to toss them off or the squatters on your land?

Government has so many rules and regulations restricting property use they're tripping over their own dick.

[P_A_I]

Government has so many rules and regulations restricting property use they're tripping over their own dick.

Guess what, -- every time some dick tries to infringe on individual freedoms on his private property, some other dick takes him to court, resulting in more rules & regulations.

How bout we just get rid of all the wannabe dicks, -- & their lawyers?